The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Phosphate Adsorption on Aluminum-Impregnated Mesoporous Silicates: Surface Structure and Behavior of Adsorbents
Abstract
Phosphorus from excess fertilizers and detergents ends up washing into lakes, creeks, and rivers. This overabundance of phosphorus causes excessive aquatic plant and algae growth and depletes the dissolved oxygen supply in the water. In this study, aluminum-impregnated mesoporous adsorbents were tested for their ability to remove phosphate from water. The surface structure of the materials was investigated with X-ray diffraction (XRD), a N2 adsorption-desorption technique, Fourier transform-infrared (FT-IR), and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) to understand the effect of surface properties on the adsorption behavior of phosphate. The mesoporous materials were loaded with Al components by reaction with surface silanol groups. In the adsorption test, the Al-impregnated mesoporous materials showed fast adsorption kinetics as well as high adsorption capacities, compared with activated alumina. The uniform mesopores of the Al-impregnated mesoporous materials caused the diffusion rate in the adsorption process to increase, which in turn caused the fast adsorption kinetics. High phosphate adsorption capacities of the Al-impregnated mesoporous materials were attributed to not only the increase of surface hydroxyl density on Al oxide due to well-dispersed impregnation of Al components but also the decrease in stoichiometry of surface hydroxyl ions to phosphate by the formation of monodentate surface complexes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sing, K. S. W. (1985) · Pure and Applied Chemistry · doi:10.1351/pac198557040603 · Cited by 24,485
Arsenate and Chromate Retention Mechanisms on Goethite. 1. Surface Structure
Fendorf, S., Eick, M. J., Grossl, P., & Sparks, D. L. (1997) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es950653t · Cited by 1,017
Cited by
Critical review in adsorption kinetic models
Qiu, H., Lv, L., Pan, B.-C., Zhang, Q.-J., Zhang, W.-M., & Zhang, Q.-X. (2009) · Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A · doi:10.1631/jzus.a0820524 · Cited by 1,776
Performance and prospects of different adsorbents for phosphorus uptake and recovery from water
Bacelo, H., Pintor, A. M. A., Santos, S. C. R., Boaventura, R. A. R., & Botelho, C. M. S. (2020) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2019.122566 · Cited by 620
Yao, Y., Gao, B., Inyang, M., Zimmerman, A. R., Cao, X., Pullammanappallil, P., & Yang, L. (2011) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.03.083 · Cited by 614
Removal of phosphate species from solution by adsorption onto calcite used as natural adsorbent
Karageorgiou, K., Paschalis, M., & Anastassakis, G. N. (2007) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.02.038 · Cited by 428
Removal of phosphate from water by a Fe–Mn binary oxide adsorbent
Zhang, G., Liu, H., Liu, R., & Qu, J. (2009) · Journal of Colloid and Interface Science · doi:10.1016/j.jcis.2009.03.019 · Cited by 420
Metadata
- Authors
- Shin, E. W., Han, J. S., Jang, M., Min, S.-H., Park, J. K., & Rowell, R. M.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2003-12-20
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 912-917
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2100262710
- Cited by
- 280
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 22.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
