The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Occurrence of Antimicrobials in the Final Effluents of Wastewater Treatment Plants in Canada
Abstract
To investigate the occurrence of antimicrobials in the final effluents from wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) in Canada, analytical methods were developed or modified from previously described methods using solid-phase extraction followed by liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry. Thirty-one antimicrobials from the macrolide, quinolone, quinoxaline dioxide, sulfonamide, and tetracycline classes were investigated in the final (treated) effluents from eight WWTPs, located in five Canadian cities. Ciprofloxacin, clarithromycin, erythromycin-H20, ofloxacin, sulfamethoxazole, sulfapyridine, and tetracycline were frequently detected in the effluents. The detection of sulfapyridine in effluents is the first report of this compound in environmental samples. Antimicrobials used exclusively for veterinary applications or treatment of livestock, such as carbadox, olaquindox, and chlortetracycline were not detected in the WWTP final effluents. There appear to be differences in the relative concentrations of antimicrobials detected in WWTP final effluents in Canada relative to concentrations reported previously in northern Europe, particularly for quinolone and sulfonamide compounds. These data may reflect differences in prescription patterns in Canada and northern Europe. The antimicrobials frequently detected in WWTP effluents appear to be those prescribed heavily in Canada for medical applications, and these compounds should be considered priority compounds for monitoring in surface water near WWTP discharges. The concentrations of antimicrobials detected in WWTP final effluents did not exceed 1 microg/L; levels that are unlikely to affect the growth and survival of aquatic organisms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Occurrence of Antibiotics in the Aquatic Environment
Hirsch, R., Ternes, T., Haberer, K., & Kratz, K.-L. (1999) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/s0048-9697(98)00337-4 · Cited by 2,140
Cited by
Tran, N. H., Reinhard, M., & Gin, K. Y.-H. (2018) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2017.12.029 · Cited by 1,686
Pharmaceuticals as emerging contaminants and their removal from water. A review
Rivera-Utrilla, J., Sánchez-Polo, M., Ferro-García, M. Á., Prados-Joya, G., & Ocampo-Pérez, R. (2013) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.07.059 · Cited by 1,486
Fatta-Kassinos, D., Meric, S., & Nikolaou, A. (2011) · Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry · doi:10.1007/s00216-010-4300-9 · Cited by 938
Wang, J., Chu, L., Wojnárovits, L., & Takács, E. (2020) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140997 · Cited by 895
Fluoroquinolone antibiotics: An emerging class of environmental micropollutants
Van Doorslaer, X., Dewulf, J., Van Langenhove, H., & Demeestere, K. (2014) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.08.075 · Cited by 819
Metadata
- Authors
- Miao, X.-S., Bishay, F., Chen, M., & Metcalfe, C. D.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2004-05-26
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 3533-3541
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W1977592347
- Cited by
- 817
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 33.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Occurrence of Antimicrobials in the Final Effluents of Wastewater Treatment Plants in Canada. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/es030653q
- The paper
- Miao, X.-S., Bishay, F., Chen, M., & Metcalfe, C. D. (2004). Occurrence of Antimicrobials in the Final Effluents of Wastewater Treatment Plants in Canada. Environmental Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1021/es030653q
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.