Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 205

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Peer Reviewed: Reducing Children's Risk from Lead in Soil

Ryan, James A., Scheckel, Kirk G., Berti, William R., Brown, Sally L., Casteel, Stan W., Chaney, Rufus L., Hallfrisch, Judith, Doolan, Mark, Grevatt, Peter, Maddaloni, Mark, Mosby, Dave·2004·Environmental Science & Technology

Abstract

ADVERTISEMENT RETURN TO ISSUEPREVFeatureNEXTPeer Reviewed: Reducing Children's Risk from Lead in SoilA field experiment in Joplin, Mo., demonstrates alternatives to traditional cleanups.James A. Ryan, Kirk G. Scheckel, William R. Berti, Sally L. Brown, Stan W. Casteel, Rufus L. Chaney, Judith Hallfrisch, Mark Doolan, Peter Grevatt, Mark Maddaloni, and Dave MosbyCite this: Environ. Sci. Technol. 2004, 38, 1, 18A–24APublication Date (Web):January 1, 2004Publication History Published online1 January 2004Published inissue 1 January 2004https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/es040337rhttps://doi.org/10.1021/es040337rnewsACS Publications. This publication is available under these Terms of Use. Request reuse permissions This publication is free to access through this site. Learn MoreArticle Views2384Altmetric-Citations153LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICSArticle Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated. Share Add toView InAdd Full Text with ReferenceAdd Description ExportRISCitationCitation and abstractCitation and referencesMore Options Share onFacebookTwitterWechatLinked InRedditEmail PDF (272 KB) Get e-AlertscloseSupporting Info (2)»Supporting Information Supporting Information SUBJECTS:Soils Get e-Alerts

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/es040337r

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 205

Metadata

Authors
Ryan, J. A., Scheckel, K. G., Berti, W. R., Brown, S. L., Casteel, S. W., Chaney, R. L., Hallfrisch, J., Doolan, M., Grevatt, P., Maddaloni, M., & Mosby, D.
Venue
Environmental Science & Technology
Published
2004-01-01
Volume
38
Issue
1
Pages
18A-24A
ISSN
  • 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5851
OpenAlex
W1995824183
Cited by
205
References
0
Type
other
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Peer Reviewed: Reducing Children's Risk from Lead in Soil. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/es040337r
The paper
Ryan, J. A., Scheckel, K. G., Berti, W. R., Brown, S. L., Casteel, S. W., Chaney, R. L., Hallfrisch, J., Doolan, M., Grevatt, P., Maddaloni, M., & Mosby, D. (2004). Peer Reviewed: Reducing Children's Risk from Lead in Soil. Environmental Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1021/es040337r

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.