The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Sorption of Three Tetracyclines by Several Soils: Assessing the Role of pH and Cation Exchange
Abstract
Tetracyclines (TCs) are widely used in veterinary medicine for treatment and prevention of disease and are present in animal waste products. Detection of TCs in soil, sediments, and water, and the growing concern of their potentially adverse effect on natural ecosystems have resulted in a need to understand their behavior in aqueous soil systems. TCs have multiple ionizable functional groups such that at environmentally relevant pH values, they may exist as a cation (+ 0 0), zwitterion (+ - 0), or a net negatively charged ion (+ - -), which complicates predicting their sorption, availability, and transport. We investigated the sorption of oxytetracycline (OTC), tetracycline (TC), and chlortetracycline (CTC) by several soils varying in pH, clay amount and type, cation exchange capacity (CEC), anion exchange capacity (AEC), and soil organic carbon in 0.01 N CaCl2, 0.001 N CaCl2, and 0.01 N KCI. All three TCs are highly sorbed, especially in acidic and high clay soils. When normalized to CEC, sorption tends to decrease with increasing pH. A sorption model in which species-specific sorption coefficients normalized to pH-dependent CEC (Kd+00, kd+-0, and kd+--) and weighted by the pH-dependent fraction of each species fit the data well across all soils except for a soil rich in gibbsite and high in AEC. Resulting kd+00 values were more than an order of magnitude larger than values for either kd+0 and kd+--values such that kd+00 alone described most of the sorption observed as a function of pH for eight soils that varied in their mineralogy and pH (pH ranged from 4 to 8).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sarmah, A. K., Meyer, M. T., & Boxall, A. B. A. (2006) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.03.026 · Cited by 3,326
Luo, Y., Xu, L., Rysz, M., Wang, Y., Zhang, H., & Alvarez, P. J. J. (2011) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es104009s · Cited by 964
Liu, P., Liu, W.-J., Jiang, H., Chen, J.-J., Li, W.-W., & Yu, H.-Q. (2012) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2012.06.085 · Cited by 643
Peiris, C., Gunatilake, S. R., Mlsna, T. E., Mohan, D., & Vithanage, M. (2017) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2017.07.150 · Cited by 604
Joy, S. R., Bartelt-Hunt, S. L., Snow, D. D., Gilley, J. E., Woodbury, B. L., Parker, D. B., Marx, D. B., & Li, X. (2013) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es4026358 · Cited by 206
Metadata
- Authors
- Sassman, S. A., & Lee, L. S.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2005-08-30
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 7452-7459
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2035780782
- Cited by
- 526
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sorption of Three Tetracyclines by Several Soils: Assessing the Role of pH and Cation Exchange. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/es0480217
- The paper
- Sassman, S. A., & Lee, L. S. (2005). Sorption of Three Tetracyclines by Several Soils: Assessing the Role of pH and Cation Exchange. Environmental Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1021/es0480217
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.