Cited by 604Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removalPharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental ImpactsEnvironmental remediation with nanomaterials

Biochar based removal of antibiotic sulfonamides and tetracyclines in aquatic environments: A critical review

Peiris, Chathuri, Gunatilake, Sameera R., Mlsna, Todd E., Mohan, Dinesh, Vithanage, Meththika·2017·Bioresource Technology

Abstract

Utilization of biochar (BC) as a low cost adsorbent for water remediation has gained an immense research interest due to their surface functionality and porosity. Although many reports on the BC based sorptive removal of Sulfonamides (SA) and Tetracyclines (TC) are available in literature, a deep insight into sorption mechanisms is yet to be reviewed. Objective of this review is to fill the research gap of a methodological understanding of sorption mechanisms and characteristics which is essential to develop efficient methods for contaminant removal. The most common adsorption mechanism can be considered as electron donor-acceptor interactions of electron withdrawing moieties with surface arene rings. The strongest adsorption of both antibiotics occurs at mildly acidic pH where the dominant species are zwitterionic or cationic. Smaller SAs exhibit micro pore-filling effects while bulky TCs experience size exclusions. Furthermore, the effect of matrix components and modifications are also been taken into account.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.07.150

Cites

83 of 83 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Peiris et al. (2017) mechanisms of tetracycline adsorption on biochar include surface complexation, hydrogen bonding, cation bridging, and electron attraction.

    “The mechanisms were demonstrated in Fig.4a including surface complexation, hydrogen bonding, cation bridging, and electron attraction.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Peiris, C., Gunatilake, S. R., Mlsna, T. E., Mohan, D., & Vithanage, M.
Affiliations
  • Mississippi State University (US)
  • Jawaharlal Nehru University (IN)
  • University of Sri Jayewardenepura (LK)
Corresponding author
Vithanage, Meththika
Venue
Bioresource Technology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-12
Volume
246
Pages
150-159
ISSN
0960-8524 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2739560992
Cited by
604
References
83
Citations by year
2026: 39 · 2025: 60 · 2024: 62 · 2023: 81 · 2022: 111 · 2021: 90 · 2020: 74 · 2019: 61 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 1
FWCI
2.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Bioresource Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Institute of Chemistry Ceylon (16-2)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Environmental remediation with nanomaterials
Keywords
biochar, sulfonamides, tetracycline, antibiotic removal, adsorption mechanism, water remediation, donor-acceptor interactions, pH effect on adsorption, pore filling, size exclusion, biochar modification, water pollution
MeSH terms
Adsorption, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Charcoal, Sulfonamides, Tetracyclines

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review