The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bioreduction of Uranium: Environmental Implications of a Pentavalent Intermediate
Abstract
The release of uranium and other transuranics into the environment, and their subsequent mobility, are subjects of intense public concern. Uranium dominates the inventory of most medium- and low-level radioactive waste sites and under oxic conditions is highly mobile as U(VI), the soluble uranyl dioxocation (UO2)2+. Specialist anaerobic bacteria are, however, able to reduce U(VI)to insoluble U(IV), offering a strategy for the bioremediation of uranium-contaminated groundwater and a potential mechanism for the biodeposition of uranium ores. Despite the environmental importance of U(VI) bioreduction, there is little information on the mechanism of this transformation. In the course of this study we used X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) to show that the subsurface metal-reducing bacterium Geobacter sulfurreducens reduces U(VI) by a one-electron reduction, forming an unstable (UO2)+ species. The final, insoluble U(IV) product could be formed either through further reduction of U(V) or through its disproportionation. When G. sulfurreducens was challenged with the chemically analogous (NpO2)+, which is stable with respect to disproportionation, it was not reduced, suggesting that it is disproportionation of U(V) which leads to the U(IV) product. This surprising discrimination between U and Np illustrates the need for mechanistic understanding and care in devising in situ bioremediation strategies for complex wastes containing other redox-active actinides, including plutonium.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
LLOYD, J. R., LEANG, C., MYERSON, A. L. H., COPPI, M. V., CUIFO, S., METHE, B., SANDLER, S. J., & LOVLEY, D. R. (2003) · Biochemical Journal · doi:10.1042/bj20020597 · Cited by 373
Self-citationUranium Reduction by Desulfovibrio desulfuricans Strain G20 and a Cytochrome c 3 Mutant
Payne, R. B., Gentry, D. M., Rapp-Giles, B. J., Casalot, L., & Wall, J. D. (2002) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.68.6.3129-3132.2002 · Cited by 167
Reduction of Actinides and Fission Products by Fe(III)-Reducing Bacteria
Lloyd, J. R., Chesnes, J., Glasauer, S., Bunker, D. J., Livens, F. R., & Lovley, D. R. (2002) · Geomicrobiology Journal · doi:10.1080/014904502317246200 · Cited by 132
Self-citation
Cited by
Lovley, D. R., Ueki, T., Zhang, T., Malvankar, N. S., Shrestha, P. M., Flanagan, K. A., Aklujkar, M., Butler, J. E., Giloteaux, L., Rotaru, A.-E., et al. (2011) · Advances in Microbial Physiology · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-387661-4.00004-5 · Cited by 705
Characterization and remediation of soils contaminated with uranium
Gavrilescu, M., Pavel, L. V., & Cretescu, I. (2009) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.07.103 · Cited by 577
The biogeochemistry and bioremediation of uranium and other priority radionuclides
Newsome, L., Morris, K., & Lloyd, J. R. (2014) · Chemical Geology · doi:10.1016/j.chemgeo.2013.10.034 · Cited by 476
Self-citationWall, J. D., & Krumholz, L. R. (2006) · Annual Review of Microbiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.micro.59.030804.121357 · Cited by 396
Recent Developments in Synthesis and Structural Chemistry of Nonaqueous Actinide Complexes
Jones, M. B., & Gaunt, A. J. (2013) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr300198m · Cited by 323
Metadata
- Authors
- Renshaw, J. C., Butchins, L. J. C., Livens, F. R., May, I., Charnock, J. M., & Lloyd, J. R.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2005-06-28
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 5657-5660
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2008453586
- Cited by
- 231
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 6.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.