The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Triplet-Sensitized Photodegradation of Sulfa Drugs Containing Six-Membered Heterocyclic Groups: Identification of an SO2 Extrusion Photoproduct
Abstract
The aquatic photochemical behavior of a class of sulfa drugs containing six-membered heterocyclic substituents (sulfamethazine, sulfamerazine, sulfadiazine, sulfachloropyridazine, and sulfadimethoxine) was investigated. Photodegradation of the sulfa drugs in a natural water sample was significantly enhanced relative to the degradation in deionized water, with the exception of sulfadimethoxine. This indicated an indirect photochemical process that was identified through the use of quenchers to be attributable to interaction with triplet excited-state dissolved organic matter (3DOM). The direct photolysis rate constant and quantum yield for both the neutral and anionic species of each sulfa drug were calculated using matrix deconvolution methods. The quantum yield values range from 0.01 x 10(-3) for the neutral form of sulfadimethoxine to 5 x 10(-3) for the anionic form of sulfamethazine and are significantly lower than those observed in a previous study for sulfa drugs containing five-membered heterocyclic substituents, although the rate constants are of similar magnitude. The primary product formed in both direct and indirect photodegradation for all five compounds was identified as a sulfur dioxide extrusion product. The predicted environmental half-lives solely attributable to direct photolysis range from 8.6 h in midsummer at 30 degrees latitude in pH 7 surface water for sulfachloropyridazine to 420 h in midwinter at 45 degrees in pH 7 surface water for sulfadimethoxine. These half-lives, except for sulfadimethoxine, will be decreased by interaction with 3DOM.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Heberer, T. (2002) · Toxicology Letters · doi:10.1016/s0378-4274(02)00041-3 · Cited by 2,995
Occurrence of Antibiotics in the Aquatic Environment
Hirsch, R., Ternes, T., Haberer, K., & Kratz, K.-L. (1999) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/s0048-9697(98)00337-4 · Cited by 2,140
Cited by
Patel, M., Kumar, R., Kishor, K., Mlsna, T., Pittman, C. U., & Mohan, D. (2019) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00299 · Cited by 2,654
Edge-nitrogenated biochar for efficient peroxydisulfate activation: An electron transfer mechanism
Wang, H., Guo, W., Liu, B., Wu, Q., Luo, H., Zhao, Q., Si, Q., Sseguya, F., & Ren, N. (2019) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2019.05.059 · Cited by 914
A comprehensive review on environmental and human health impacts of chemical pesticide usage
Zhou, W., Li, M., & Achal, V. (2025) · Emerging Contaminants · doi:10.1016/j.emcon.2024.100410 · Cited by 624
Wenk, J., von Gunten, U., & Canonica, S. (2011) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es102212t · Cited by 507
Fan, Y., Ji, Y., Kong, D., Lu, J., & Zhou, Q. (2015) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.06.058 · Cited by 450
Metadata
- Authors
- Boreen, A. L., Arnold, W. A., & McNeill, K.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2005-04-14
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 3630-3638
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2045538116
- Cited by
- 373
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 8.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Triplet-Sensitized Photodegradation of Sulfa Drugs Containing Six-Membered Heterocyclic Groups: Identification of an SO2 Extrusion Photoproduct. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/es048331p
- The paper
- Boreen, A. L., Arnold, W. A., & McNeill, K. (2005). Triplet-Sensitized Photodegradation of Sulfa Drugs Containing Six-Membered Heterocyclic Groups: Identification of an SO2 Extrusion Photoproduct. Environmental Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1021/es048331p
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.