The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Extraction of Oxidized and Reduced Forms of Uranium from Contaminated Soils: Effects of Carbonate Concentration and pH
Abstract
Uranium may present in soil as precipitated, sorbed, complexed, and reduced forms, which impact its mobility and fate in the subsurface soil environment. In this study, a uranium-contaminated soil was extracted with carbonate/ bicarbonate at varying concentrations (0-1 M), pHs, and redox conditions in an attempt to evaluate their effects on the extraction efficiency and selectivity for various forms of uranium in the soil. Results indicate that at least three differentforms of uranium existed in the contaminated soil: uranium(VI) phosphate minerals, reduced U(IV) phases, and U(VI) complexed with soil organic matter. A small fraction of U(VI) could be sorbed onto soil minerals. The mechanism involved in the leaching of U(VI) by carbonates appears to involve three processes which may act concurrently or independently: the dissolution of uranium(VI) phosphate and other mineral phases, the oxidation-complexation of U(IV) under oxic conditions, and the desorption of U(VI)-organic matter complexes at elevated pH conditions. This study suggests that, depending on site-specific geochemical conditions, the presence of small quantities of carbonate/bicarbonate could result in a rapid and greatly increased leaching and the mobilization of U(VI) from the contaminated soil. Even the reduced U(IV) phases (only sparingly soluble in water) are subjected to rapid oxidation and therefore potential leaching into the environment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Test of an Ascorbic Acid Method for Determining Phosphorus in Water and NaHCO 3 Extracts from Soil
Watanabe, F. S., & Olsen, S. R. (1965) · Soil Science Society of America Journal · doi:10.2136/sssaj1965.03615995002900060025x · Cited by 2,485
Cited by
Characterization and remediation of soils contaminated with uranium
Gavrilescu, M., Pavel, L. V., & Cretescu, I. (2009) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.07.103 · Cited by 577
Uranium(VI) adsorption on graphene oxide nanosheets from aqueous solutions
Li, Z., Chen, F., Yuan, L., Liu, Y., Zhao, Y., Chai, Z., & Shi, W. (2012) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2012.09.030 · Cited by 477
A Highly Selective DNAzyme Sensor for Mercuric Ions
Hollenstein, M., Hipolito, C., Lam, C., Dietrich, D., & Perrin, D. M. (2008) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.200800960 · Cited by 317
Jung, J. H., Lee, J. H., & Shinkai, S. (2011) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c1cs15051k · Cited by 273
Wu, W.-M., Carley, J., Gentry, T., Ginder-Vogel, M. A., Fienen, M., Mehlhorn, T., Yan, H., Caroll, S., Pace, M. N., Nyman, J., et al. (2006) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es051960u · Cited by 269
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhou, P., & Gu, B.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2005-04-30
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 4435-4440
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2026476028
- Cited by
- 227
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.