The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
SH Radical: The Key Intermediate in Sulfur Transformation during Thermal Processing of Coal
Abstract
To uncouple the complex behavior of sulfur transformation during thermal processing of coal and to elucidate the main mechanism, typical organic and inorganic sulfur compounds impregnated on or mixed with a low-ash char are studied through temperature-programmed decomposition coupled with online mass spectrum analysis (TPDMS) and followed by temperature-programmed oxidation coupled also with online mass spectrum analysis (TPOMS) in a temperature range of up to 800 degrees C. It is evident that the cleavages of Cal-S and Car-S bonds, where the subscripts al and ar stand for aliphatic and aromatic carbon, respectively, in the organic compounds result in the formation of SH radicals, which then undergo secondary reactions with the char to form various sulfur compounds such as H2S, SO2, COS, and elemental sulfur, as well as sulfur structures in the char. H2 has the ability to stabilize the -* SH radicals and weaken the interactions between the -* SH radicals and the char. For the sulfur compounds, which do not generate the *SH radical, the only sulfur products detected are those formed directly from the decomposition of the starting sulfur compounds, H2S from FeS2 in H2 or SO2 from Fe2(SO4)3 in He, for example, and no sulfur structure is formed in the char. Minerals have significant effects on the bond cleavage temperature and the reactions of the *SH radicals with the char. It is clear that the *SH radical is a key species interacting with the char to form secondary sulfur compounds, while H2S and SO2 play no role in the sulfur transformation to the carbon structure.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Westberg, H. M., Byström, M., & Leckner, B. (2003) · Energy & Fuels · doi:10.1021/ef020060l · Cited by 105
Cited by
Liu, S., Li, L., Guo, L., Jin, H., Kou, J., & Li, G. (2017) · Energy & Fuels · doi:10.1021/acs.energyfuels.7b02505 · Cited by 56
Farooq, M. Z., Yu, H., Lin, F., Rajput, M. I., Kumar, A., & Chen, G. (2024) · Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis · doi:10.1016/j.jaap.2024.106626 · Cited by 38
Metadata
- Authors
- Yan, J., Yang, J., & Liu, Z.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2005-05-20
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 5043-5051
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2075594129
- Cited by
- 158
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: SH Radical: The Key Intermediate in Sulfur Transformation during Thermal Processing of Coal. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/es048398c
- The paper
- Yan, J., Yang, J., & Liu, Z. (2005). SH Radical: The Key Intermediate in Sulfur Transformation during Thermal Processing of Coal. Environmental Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1021/es048398c
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.