The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Removal of Arsenic(III) from Groundwater by Nanoscale Zero-Valent Iron
Abstract
Nanoscale zero-valent iron (NZVI) was synthesized and tested for the removal of As(III), which is a highly toxic, mobile, and predominant arsenic species in anoxic groundwater. We used SEM-EDX, AFM, and XRD to characterize particle size, surface morphology, and corrosion layers formed on pristine NZVI and As(III)-treated NZVI. AFM results showed that particle size ranged from 1 to 120 nm. XRD and SEM results revealed that NZVI gradually converted to magnetite/maghemite corrosion products mixed with lepidocrocite over 60 d. Arsenic(III) adsorption kinetics were rapid and occurred on a scale of minutes following a pseudo-first-order rate expression with observed reaction rate constants (K(obs)) of 0.07-1.3 min(-1) (at varied NZVI concentration). These values are about 1000x higher than K(obs) literature values for As(III) adsorption on micron size ZVI. Batch experiments were performed to determine the feasibility of NZVI as an adsorbent for As(III) treatment in groundwater as affected by initial As(III) concentration and pH (pH 3-12). The maximum As(III) adsorption capacity in batch experiments calculated by Freundlich adsorption isotherm was 3.5 mg of As(III)/g of NZVI. Laser light scattering (electrophoretic mobility measurement) confirmed NZVI-As(III) inner-sphere surface complexation. The effects of competing anions showed HCO3-, H4SiO4(0), and H2P04(2-) are potential interferences in the As(III) adsorption reaction. Our results suggest that NZVI is a suitable candidate for both in-situ and ex-situ groundwater treatment due to its high reactivity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nanoscale iron particles for environmental remediation: An overview
Zhang, W.-X. (2003) · Journal of Nanoparticle Research · doi:10.1023/a:1025520116015 · Cited by 2,003
Arsenic Contamination of Groundwater and Drinking Water in Vietnam: A Human Health Threat
Berg, M., Tran, H. C., Nguyen, T. C., Pham, H. V., Schertenleib, R., & Giger, W. (2001) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es010027y · Cited by 1,096
Arsenate and Chromate Retention Mechanisms on Goethite. 1. Surface Structure
Fendorf, S., Eick, M. J., Grossl, P., & Sparks, D. L. (1997) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es950653t · Cited by 1,017
Cited by
Arsenic removal from water/wastewater using adsorbents—A critical review
Mohan, D., & Pittman, C. U. (2007) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.01.006 · Cited by 3,536
New Generation Adsorbents for Water Treatment
Ali, I. (2012) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr300133d · Cited by 1,758
Removal of arsenic from water by supported nano zero-valent iron on activated carbon
Zhu, H., Jia, Y., Wu, X., & Wang, H. (2009) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.08.031 · Cited by 688
A Review of Removal of Pollutants from Water/Wastewater Using Different Types of Nanomaterials
Amin, M. T., Alazba, A. A., & Manzoor, U. (2014) · Advances in Materials Science and Engineering · doi:10.1155/2014/825910 · Cited by 645
Li, Z., Wang, L., Meng, J., Liu, X., Xu, J., Wang, F., & Brookes, P. (2018) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.09.036 · Cited by 594
Metadata
- Authors
- Kanel, S. R., Manning, B., Charlet, L., & Choi, H.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2005-01-06
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1291-1298
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2021436332
- Cited by
- 1,166
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 21.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Removal of Arsenic(III) from Groundwater by Nanoscale Zero-Valent Iron. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/es048991u
- The paper
- Kanel, S. R., Manning, B., Charlet, L., & Choi, H. (2005). Removal of Arsenic(III) from Groundwater by Nanoscale Zero-Valent Iron. Environmental Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1021/es048991u
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.