The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Power Generation in Fed-Batch Microbial Fuel Cells as a Function of Ionic Strength, Temperature, and Reactor Configuration
Abstract
Power density, electrode potential, coulombic efficiency, and energy recovery in single-chamber microbial fuel cells (MFCs) were examined as a function of solution ionic strength, electrode spacing and composition, and temperature. Increasing the solution ionic strength from 100 to 400 mM by adding NaCl increased power output from 720 to 1330 mW/m2. Power generation was also increased from 720 to 1210 mW/m2 by decreasing the distance between the anode and cathode from 4to 2 cm. The power increases due to ionic strength and electrode spacing resulted from a decrease in the internal resistance. Power output was also increased by 68% by replacing the cathode (purchased from a manufacturer) with our own carbon cloth cathode containing the same Pt loading. The performance of conventional anaerobic treatment processes, such as anaerobic digestion, are adversely affected by temperatures below 30 degrees C. However, decreasing the temperature from 32 to 20 degrees C reduced power output by only 9%, primarily as a result of the reduction of the cathode potential. Coulombic efficiencies and overall energy recovery varied as a function of operating conditions, but were a maximum of 61.4 and 15.1% (operating conditions of 32 degrees C, carbon paper cathode, and the solution amended with 300 mM NaCl). These results, which demonstrate that power densities can be increased to over 1 W/m2 by changing the operating conditions or electrode spacing, should lead to further improvements in power generation and energy recovery in single-chamber, air-cathode MFCs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Electrode-Reducing Microorganisms That Harvest Energy from Marine Sediments
Bond, D. R., Holmes, D. E., Tender, L. M., & Lovley, D. R. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1066771 · Cited by 1,437
Cited by
Exoelectrogenic bacteria that power microbial fuel cells
Logan, B. E. (2009) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro2113 · Cited by 2,383
Self-citationMicrobial Electrolysis Cells for High Yield Hydrogen Gas Production from Organic Matter
Logan, B. E., Call, D., Cheng, S., Hamelers, H. V. M., Sleutels, T. H. J. A., Jeremiasse, A. W., & Rozendal, R. A. (2008) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es801553z · Cited by 1,368
Self-citationCathodic limitations in microbial fuel cells: An overview
Rismani-Yazdi, H., Carver, S. M., Christy, A. D., & Tuovinen, O. H. (2008) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.02.074 · Cited by 734
Kim, J. R., Cheng, S., Oh, S.-E., & Logan, B. E. (2007) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es062202m · Cited by 699
Self-citationIncreasing power generation for scaling up single-chamber air cathode microbial fuel cells
Cheng, S., & Logan, B. E. (2011) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2010.12.104 · Cited by 331
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, H., Cheng, S., & Logan, B. E.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2005-06-11
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 5488-5493
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2087273401
- Cited by
- 953
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 34.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Power Generation in Fed-Batch Microbial Fuel Cells as a Function of Ionic Strength, Temperature, and Reactor Configuration. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/es050316c
- The paper
- Liu, H., Cheng, S., & Logan, B. E. (2005). Power Generation in Fed-Batch Microbial Fuel Cells as a Function of Ionic Strength, Temperature, and Reactor Configuration. Environmental Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1021/es050316c
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.