The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fine (PM2.5) and Coarse (PM2.5-10) Particulate Matter on A Heavily Trafficked London Highway: Sources and Processes
Abstract
A large dataset for PM2.5 and PMcoarse (PM2.5-10) concentrations monitored near a busy London highway (Marylebone Road) has been analyzed to define the factors that lead to high concentrations. The following have been highlighted as major influencing parameters: wind speed, prevailing wind direction (because of its role on the microscale dispersion within the street), the daily cycle of the atmospheric boundary layer (stable during the night/ convective and mixed during the day), and traffic density. The mainly diesel heavy-duty vehicles are the main source of fine particulate matter at Marylebone Road. In particular, lorries (trucks) dominate PM10 exhaust emissions which are mainly in the fine (<2.5 microm) size range. A strong correlation with PMcoarse suggests that the heavy-duty traffic is largely responsible for this component also. Substantial local increments in PM2.5 and PMcoarse due to traffic have been estimated and a large part of the increment in PMcoarse concentrations is inferred to arise from resuspended road dust emissions since the contribution of abrasion processes estimated from emission factors is modest. Despite the strong influence of traffic on PM concentrations measured at Marylebone Road the analysis of factors leading to the highest 5% of hourly concentrations of PM10 at Marylebone Road reveals that almost half of these events were due to building works. The other events occurred when all or most of the key factors occurred simultaneously (heavy traffic, poor dispersion, etc.). Some episodes of high PM2.5 concentrations were associated with long-range transport in which the regional PM2.5 constituted most of the local concentrations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Metal emissions from road traffic and the influence of resuspension—results from two tunnel studies
Sternbeck, J., Sjödin, Å., & Andréasson, K. (2002) · Atmospheric Environment · doi:10.1016/s1352-2310(02)00561-7 · Cited by 815
Cited by
Harrison, R. M., Jones, A. M., Gietl, J., Yin, J., & Green, D. C. (2012) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es300894r · Cited by 600
Self-citationReche, C., Querol, X., Alastuey, A., Viana, M., Pey, J., Moreno, T., Rodríguez, S., González, Y., Fernández-Camacho, R., de la Rosa, J., et al. (2011) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-11-6207-2011 · Cited by 365
Self-citationJeanjean, A. P. R., Buccolieri, R., Eddy, J., Monks, P. S., & Leigh, R. J. (2017) · Urban Forestry & Urban Greening · doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2017.01.009 · Cited by 257
Dionisio, K. L., Rooney, M. S., Arku, R. E., Friedman, A. B., Hughes, A. F., Vallarino, J., Agyei-Mensah, S., Spengler, J. D., & Ezzati, M. (2010) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.0901365 · Cited by 100
Degrendele, C., Okonski, K., Melymuk, L., Landlová, L., Kukučka, P., Čupr, P., & Klánová, J. (2014) · Atmospheric Environment · doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.09.001 · Cited by 69
Metadata
- Authors
- Charron, A., & Harrison, R. M.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2005-09-14
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 20
- Pages
- 7768-7776
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2017123493
- Cited by
- 215
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.