Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 280

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Pyrethroid Insecticides and Sediment Toxicity in Urban Creeks from California and Tennessee

Amweg, Erin L., Weston, Donald P., You, Jing, Lydy, Michael J.·2006·Environmental Science & Technology

Abstract

Pyrethroid pesticides have replaced organophosphates for many urban applications, including structural pest control, landscape maintenance, and residential home and garden use. This study was intended to determine if pyrethroids are detectable and widespread in diverse urban systems and if concentrations are high enough to cause associated aquatic toxicity. Urban creeks in California and Tennessee were tested on up to four occasions for pesticide residues in sediments, and aquatic toxicity was determined by acute toxicity tests using the amphipod, Hyalella azteca. In California, 12 of the 15 creeks tested were toxic on at least one sampling occasion, and sediment pyrethroid concentrations were sufficient to explain the observed toxicity in most cases. The pyrethroid bifenthrin, due to its high concentrations and relative toxicity as compared to other pyrethroids, was likely responsible for the majority of the toxicity at most sites. Cypermethrin, cyfluthrin, deltamethrin, and lambda-cyhalothrin also contributed to toxicity at some locations. The source of cypermethrin and deltamethrin was probably almost entirely structural pest control by professional applicators. Bifenthrin, cyfluthrin, and lambda-cyhalothrin may have originated either from professional structural pest control or from lawn and garden care by homeowners. None of the sediments collected from the 12 Tennessee creeks were toxic, and pyrethroids were rarely detectable. Regional differences between Tennessee and California are possibly attributable to climate, differences in types of residential development, and pesticide use practices.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/es051407c

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Cited by

See all 280

Metadata

Authors
Amweg, E. L., Weston, D. P., You, J., & Lydy, M. J.
Venue
Environmental Science & Technology
Published
2006-01-31
Volume
40
Issue
5
Pages
1700-1706
ISSN
  • 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5851
OpenAlex
W1969406497
Cited by
280
References
8
FWCI
19.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pyrethroid Insecticides and Sediment Toxicity in Urban Creeks from California and Tennessee. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/es051407c
The paper
Amweg, E. L., Weston, D. P., You, J., & Lydy, M. J. (2006). Pyrethroid Insecticides and Sediment Toxicity in Urban Creeks from California and Tennessee. Environmental Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1021/es051407c

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.