The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Secondary Organic Carbon and Aerosol Yields from the Irradiations of Isoprene and α-Pinene in the Presence of NOx and SO2
Abstract
A laboratory study was carried out to investigate the secondary organic carbon (SOC) yields of alpha-pinene and isoprene in the presence of SO2, which produces acidic aerosol in the system. Experiments were based on irradiating each hydrocarbon (HC) with NOx in a 14.5 m3 smog chamber operated in the dynamic mode. The experimental design consisted of several multi-part experiments for each HC. In the first part of each experiment, an HC/NOx irradiation was conducted in the absence of SO2 and was followed by irradiations with the addition of SO2 in subsequent parts. Filter-based analyses for organic carbon were made using a thermal-optical approach either with an off-line instrument or in situ with an automated instrument. For isoprene in the absence of SO2, the SOC yield was approximately 0.001, a value consistent with earlier work from this laboratory. With the addition of up to 200 ppb SO2, the yield increased by a factor of 7. For alpha-pinene in the absence of SO2, the SOC yield of the irradiated mixture was found to average 0.096 from two experiments. With SO2 in the system, the SOC yield increased on average to 0.132. These results suggest that SO2, and by inference acidic aerosol, may play a role in increasing the yield of SOC from the photooxidation products of biogenic hydrocarbons or by the direct uptake of biogenic hydrocarbons onto acidic aerosol.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Molecular structure in soil humic substances: the new view
Sutton, R., & Sposito, G. (2005) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es050778q · Cited by 1,316
Cited by
A review of Secondary Organic Aerosol (SOA) formation from isoprene
Carlton, A. G., Wiedinmyer, C., & Kroll, J. H. (2009) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-9-4987-2009 · Cited by 912
Organosulfate Formation in Biogenic Secondary Organic Aerosol
Surratt, J. D., Gómez-González, Y., Chan, A. W. H., Vermeylen, R., Shahgholi, M., Kleindienst, T. E., Edney, E. O., Offenberg, J. H., Lewandowski, M., Jaoui, M., et al. (2008) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry A · doi:10.1021/jp802310p · Cited by 730
Self-citationKleindienst, T. E., Jaoui, M., Lewandowski, M., Offenberg, J. H., Lewis, C. W., Bhave, P. V., & Edney, E. O. (2007) · Atmospheric Environment · doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.06.045 · Cited by 502
Self-citationEffect of Acidity on Secondary Organic Aerosol Formation from Isoprene
Surratt, J. D., Lewandowski, M., Offenberg, J. H., Jaoui, M., Kleindienst, T. E., Edney, E. O., & Seinfeld, J. H. (2007) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es0704176 · Cited by 476
Self-citationMarais, E. A., Jacob, D. J., Jimenez, J. L., Campuzano-Jost, P., Day, D. A., Hu, W., Krechmer, J., Zhu, L., Kim, P. S., Miller, C. C., et al. (2016) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-16-1603-2016 · Cited by 342
Metadata
- Authors
- Kleindienst, T. E., Edney, E. O., Lewandowski, M., Offenberg, J. H., & Jaoui, M.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2006-05-12
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 3807-3812
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W1982868932
- Cited by
- 160
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.