Cited by 1,316Soil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsHumic Substances and Bio-Organic StudiesMarine and coastal ecosystems

Molecular structure in soil humic substances: the new view

Sutton, Rebecca, Sposito, Garrison·2005·Environmental Science & Technology

Abstract

A critical examination of published data obtained primarily from recent nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, X-ray absorption near-edge structure spectroscopy, electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry, and pyrolysis studies reveals an evolving new view of the molecular structure of soil humic substances. According to the new view, humic substances are collections of diverse, relatively low molecular mass components forming dynamic associations stabilized by hydrophobic interactions and hydrogen bonds. These associations are capable of organizing into micellar structures in suitable aqueous environments. Humic components display contrasting molecular motional behavior and may be spatially segregated on a scale of nanometers. Within this new structural context, these components comprise any molecules intimately associated with a humic substance, such that they cannot be separated effectively by chemical or physical methods. Thus biomolecules strongly bound within humic fractions are by definition humic components, a conclusion that necessarily calls into question key biogeochemical pathways traditionally thought to be required for the formation of humic substances. Further research is needed to elucidate the intermolecular interactions that link humic components into supramolecular associations and to establish the pathways by which these associations emerge from the degradation of organic litter.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/es050778q

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Early eluting, more volatile total ion chromatogram peaks from Py-GC/MS of the Centrosaurus bone may come from sources other than proteins.

    “Humic acids are common in soils and contain low molecular weight, aromatic components (Hatcher et al., 1981; Sutton and Sposito, 2005), and these were also detected in the humic acid standard, meaning that the early eluting, more volatile (i.e. lower boiling point), total ion chromatogram peaks from Py-GC/MS (e.g. the detected aromatic hydrocarbons) of the Centrosaurus bone may come from sources”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sutton, R., & Sposito, G.
Affiliations
University of California, Berkeley (US)
Corresponding author
Sutton, Rebecca
Venue
Environmental Science & Technology
Published
2005-10-29
Volume
39
Issue
23
Pages
9009-9015
ISSN
  • 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5851
OpenAlex
W2006117571
Cited by
1,316
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 64 · 2025: 62 · 2024: 50 · 2023: 70 · 2022: 66 · 2021: 52 · 2020: 71 · 2019: 74 · 2018: 69 · 2017: 70 · 2016: 59 · 2015: 67 · 2014: 74 · 2013: 63 · 2012: 63
FWCI
9.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Environmental Science & Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel (GEOMAR) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Humic Substances and Bio-Organic Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Marine and coastal ecosystems
Keywords
soil humic substances, molecular structure, supramolecular association, hydrophobic interactions, hydrogen bonding, micellar structure, spatial segregation, intermolecular interactions
MeSH terms
Humic Substances, Micelles, Molecular Structure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review