The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Concentrations of Polychlorinated Biphenyls in Indoor Air and Polybrominated Diphenyl Ethers in Indoor Air and Dust in Birmingham, United Kingdom: Implications for Human Exposure
Abstract
Polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) were measured in air (using PUF disk passive samplers) in 31 homes, 33 offices, 25 cars, and 3 public microenvironments. Average concentrations of sigmaBDE (273 pg m(-3)) and sigmaPCB (8920 pg m(-3)) were an order of magnitude higher than those previously reported for outdoor air. Cars were the most contaminated microenvironment for sigmaBDE (average = 709 pg m(-3)), but the least for sigmaPCB (average = 1391 pg m(-3)). Comparison with data from a previous spatially consistent study, revealed no significant decline in concentrations of sigmaPCB in indoor air since 1997-98. Concentrations in indoor dust from 8 homes were on average 215.2 ng sigmaBDE g(-1), slightly higher than other European dust samples, but twenty times lower than Canadian samples. Inhalation makes an important contribution (between 4.2 and 63% for adults) to overall UK exposure to sigmaPCB. For sigmaBDE, dust ingestion makes a significant but--in contrast to Canada-a not overwhelming contribution (up to 37% for adults, and 69% for toddlers). Comparison of UK and Canadian estimates of absolute exposure to sigmaBDE suggest that differences in dust contamination are the likely cause of higher PBDE body burdens in North Americans compared to Europeans.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
SVOC exposure indoors: fresh look at dermal pathways: SVOC exposure via dermal pathways
Weschler, C. J., & Nazaroff, W. W. (2012) · Indoor Air · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0668.2012.00772.x · Cited by 422
Harrad, S., de Wit, C. A., Abdallah, M. A.-E., Bergh, C., Björklund, J. A., Covaci, A., Darnerud, P. O., de Boer, J., Diamond, M., Huber, S., et al. (2010) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es903476t · Cited by 300
Self-citationStuart, H., Ibarra, C., Abdallah, M. A.-E., Boon, R., Neels, H., & Covaci, A. (2008) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2008.05.001 · Cited by 295
Self-citationBrominated flame retardants – Exposure and risk assessment for the general population
Fromme, H., Becher, G., Hilger, B., & Völkel, W. (2016) · International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health · doi:10.1016/j.ijheh.2015.08.004 · Cited by 277
Overview of air pollution and endocrine disorders
Darbre, P. (2018) · International Journal of General Medicine · doi:10.2147/ijgm.s102230 · Cited by 248
Metadata
- Authors
- Harrad, S., Hazrati, S., & Ibarra, C.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2006-06-29
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 4633-4638
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W1968881849
- Cited by
- 417
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 19.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Concentrations of Polychlorinated Biphenyls in Indoor Air and Polybrominated Diphenyl Ethers in Indoor Air and Dust in Birmingham, United Kingdom: Implications for Human Exposure. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/es0609147
- The paper
- Harrad, S., Hazrati, S., & Ibarra, C. (2006). Concentrations of Polychlorinated Biphenyls in Indoor Air and Polybrominated Diphenyl Ethers in Indoor Air and Dust in Birmingham, United Kingdom: Implications for Human Exposure. Environmental Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1021/es0609147
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.