The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Impact of Fullerene (C60) on a Soil Microbial Community
Abstract
The nascent state of the nanoproduct industry calls for important early assessment of environmental impacts before significant releases have occurred. Clearly, the impact of manufactured nanomaterials on key soil processes must be addressed so that an unbiased discussion concerning the environmental consequences of nanotechnology can take place. In this study, soils were treated with either 1 microg C60 g(-1) soil in aqueous suspension (nC60) or 1000 microg C60 g(-1) soil in granularform, a control containing equivalent tetrahydrofuran residues as generated during nC60 formation process or water and incubated for up to 180 days. Treatment effects on soil respiration, both basal and glucose-induced, were evaluated. The effects on the soil microbial community size was evaluated using total phospholipid derived phosphate. The impact on community structure was evaluated using both fatty acid profiles and following extraction of total genomic DNA, by DGGE after PCR amplification of total genomic DNA using bacterial variable V3 region targeted primers. In addition, treatment affects on soil enzymatic activities for beta-glucosidase, acid-phosphatase, dehydrogenase, and urease were followed. Our observations show that the introduction of fullerene, as either C60 or nC60, has little impact on the structure and function of the soil microbial community and microbial processes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Differentiating microbial and stabilized β-glucosidase activity relative to soil quality
Knight, T. R., & Dick, R. P. (2004) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2004.06.007 · Cited by 196
Cited by
Nanomaterials in the environment: Behavior, fate, bioavailability, and effects
Klaine, S. J., Alvarez, P. J. J., Batley, G. E., Fernandes, T. F., Handy, R. D., Lyon, D. Y., Mahendra, S., McLaughlin, M. J., & Lead, J. R. (2008) · Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry · doi:10.1897/08-090.1 · Cited by 2,764
Occurrence, behavior and effects of nanoparticles in the environment
Nowack, B., & Bucheli, T. D. (2007) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2007.06.006 · Cited by 2,286
Heinlaan, M., Ivask, A., Blinova, I., Dubourguier, H.-C., & Kahru, A. (2008) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.11.047 · Cited by 1,522
Nanoscale zero-valent iron: Future prospects for an emerging water treatment technology
Crane, R. A., & Scott, T. B. (2012) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.11.073 · Cited by 1,154
The ecotoxicology and chemistry of manufactured nanoparticles
Handy, R. D., von der Kammer, F., Lead, J. R., Hassellöv, M., Owen, R., & Crane, M. (2008) · Ecotoxicology · doi:10.1007/s10646-008-0199-8 · Cited by 916
Metadata
- Authors
- Tong, Z., Bischoff, M., Nies, L., Applegate, B., & Turco, R. F.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2007-03-14
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 2985-2991
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2080130977
- Cited by
- 345
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 36.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.