The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Photodegradation of Perfluorooctane Sulfonate by UV Irradiation in Water and Alkaline 2-Propanol
Abstract
Perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) is the environmentally concerned compound because of its persistence and bioaccumulative properties. Since photodegradation of PFOS is not yet experimentally confirmed, photodegradation study of PFOS in water and alkaline 2-propanol solution was conducted. Aqueous and alkaline 2-propanol solution of PFOS (40 microM) was irradiated with a low-pressure mercury lamp (254 nm, 32 W) by internal irradiation for 10 d, and then PFOS, fluoride and sulfate ions, and the other degradation products were analyzed. Photodegradation of PFOS was confirmed in both media. PFOS was degraded by 8% after 1 day and by 68% after 10 days irradiation compared to the initial concentration in water. In alkaline 2-propanol, 76 and 92% of PFOS was degraded after 1 and 10 days irradiation, respectively. Photodegradation of PFOS in alkaline 2-propanol was much faster and effective than in water, as the photodegradation rate constants were 0.93 days(-1) in alkaline 2-propanol and 0.13 days(-1) in water, respectively. Formation of fluoride and sulfate was also confirmed by ion chromatography and X-ray diffraction analysis. From observation of the degradation products, two major degradation pathways of PFOS were considered: via C8HF17 and C8F17OH, respectively, resulting in short-chain fluorinated compounds such as C7HF15 and C7F15OH by stepwise removal of CF2. Formation of short-chain fluorocarbons such as CF4, C2F6, and C3F8 were also confirmed. This is the first study to confirm photodegradation of PFOS in water and alkaline 2-propanol.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Global Distribution of Perfluorooctane Sulfonate in Wildlife
Giesy, J. P., & Kannan, K. (2001) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es001834k · Cited by 2,750
Cited by
Yu, Q., Zhang, R., Deng, S., Huang, J., & Yu, G. (2009) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2008.12.001 · Cited by 890
Li, F., Duan, J., Tian, S., Ji, H., Zhu, Y., Wei, Z., & Zhao, D. (2020) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2019.122506 · Cited by 707
Treatment of poly- and perfluoroalkyl substances in U.S. full-scale water treatment systems
Appleman, T. D., Higgins, C. P., Quiñones, O., Vanderford, B. J., Kolstad, C., Zeigler-Holady, J. C., & Dickenson, E. R. V. (2014) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2013.10.067 · Cited by 585
Trojanowicz, M., Bojanowska-Czajka, A., Bartosiewicz, I., & Kulisa, K. (2018) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2017.10.153 · Cited by 550
Huang, S., & Jaffé, P. R. (2019) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.9b04047 · Cited by 524
Metadata
- Authors
- Yamamoto, T., Noma, Y., Sakai, S.-I., & Shibata, Y.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2007-07-07
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 5660-5665
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2093067659
- Cited by
- 188
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.