Cycle Development and Design for CO 2 Capture from Flue Gas by Vacuum Swing Adsorption
Abstract
CO2 capture and storage is an important component in the development of clean power generation processes. One CO2 capture technology is gas-phase adsorption, specifically pressure (or vacuum) swing adsorption. The complexity of these processes makes evaluation and assessment of new adsorbents difficult and time-consuming. In this study, we have developed a simple model specifically targeted at CO2 capture by pressure swing adsorption and validated our model by comparison with data from a fully instrumented pilot-scale pressure swing adsorption process. The model captures nonisothermal effects as well as nonlinear adsorption and nitrogen coadsorption. Using the model and our apparatus, we have designed and studied a large number of cycles for CO2 capture. We demonstrate that by careful management of adsorption fronts and assembly of cycles based on understanding of the roles of individual steps, we are able to quickly assess the effect of adsorbents and process parameters on capture performance and identify optimal operating regimes and cycles. We recommend this approach in contrast to exhaustive parametric studies which tend to depend on specifics of the chosen cycle and adsorbent. We show that appropriate combinations of process steps can yield excellent process performance and demonstrate how the pressure drop, and heat loss, etc. affect process performance through their effect on adsorption fronts and profiles. Finally, cyclic temperature profiles along the adsorption column can be readily used to infer concentration profiles-this has proved to be a very useful tool in cyclic function definition. Our research reveals excellent promise for the application of pressure/vacuum swing adsorption technology in the arena of CO2 capture from flue gases.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Via an arrangement of maximum 4 beds, CO2 purity was enhanced from 8% to about 40%, and recoveries were reported more than 95%.
“via the arrangement constituted of maximum 4 beds, CO 2 purity was enhanced from 8% to about 40 %; also recoveries were reported more than 95 %.”
From Biomass/Biochar carbon materials for CO2 capture and sequestration by cyclic adsorption processes: A review and prospects for future directions (2022) · cites this paper as [65]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Rufford, T. E., Smart, S., Watson, G. C. Y., Graham, B. F., Boxall, J., Diniz da Costa, J. C., & May, E. F. (2012) · Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.petrol.2012.06.016 · Cited by 676 · see citing works
Carbon-Based Adsorbents for Postcombustion CO <sub>2</sub> Capture: A Critical Review
Creamer, A. E., & Gao, B. (2016) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.6b00627 · Cited by 598 · see citing works
Hedin, N., Andersson, L., Bergström, L., & Yan, J. (2013) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.11.034 · Cited by 424 · see citing works
Karimi, M., Shirzad, M., Silva, J. A. C., & Rodrigues, A. E. (2022) · Journal of CO2 Utilization · doi:10.1016/j.jcou.2022.101890 · Cited by 237 · see citing works
Competition of CO2/H2O in adsorption based CO2 capture
Li, G., Xiao, P., Webley, P. A., Zhang, J., & Singh, R. (2009) · Energy Procedia · doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2009.01.148 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Self-citationTwo-Stage VPSA Process for CO<sub>2</sub> Capture from Flue Gas Using Activated Carbon Beads
Shen, C., Liu, Z., Li, P., & Yu, J. (2012) · Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · doi:10.1021/ie202097y · Cited by 138 · see citing works
Green coffee based CO2 adsorbent with high performance in postcombustion conditions
Plaza, M. G., González, A. S., Pevida, C., & Rubiera, F. (2015) · Fuel · doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2014.10.014 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Li, Y., Zhao, J., Cao, X. E., & Li, S. (2026) · Separation and Purification Technology · doi:10.1016/j.seppur.2026.137462 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
- Authors
- Zhang, J., & Webley, P. A.
- Affiliations
- CO2CRC (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Webley, Paul A.
- ORCID
- Webley, Paul A.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2007-12-07
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 563-569
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2053816437
- Cited by
- 132
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 13
- FWCI
- 13.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Environmental Science & Technology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Australian Government
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Industrial Gas Emission Control
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Adsorption and Cooling Systems
- Keywords
- CO2 capture, flue gas, vacuum swing adsorption, pressure swing adsorption, adsorption modeling, non-isothermal adsorption, adsorbent evaluation, pressure drop, heat loss, concentration profiles, carbon capture and storage
- MeSH terms
- Adsorption, Air Pollutants, Air Pollution, Carbon Dioxide, Models, Chemical, Vacuum
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review