Cited by 132Carbon Dioxide Capture TechnologiesIndustrial Gas Emission ControlAdsorption and Cooling Systems

Cycle Development and Design for CO 2 Capture from Flue Gas by Vacuum Swing Adsorption

Zhang, Jun, Webley, Paul A.·2008·Environmental Science & Technology

Abstract

CO2 capture and storage is an important component in the development of clean power generation processes. One CO2 capture technology is gas-phase adsorption, specifically pressure (or vacuum) swing adsorption. The complexity of these processes makes evaluation and assessment of new adsorbents difficult and time-consuming. In this study, we have developed a simple model specifically targeted at CO2 capture by pressure swing adsorption and validated our model by comparison with data from a fully instrumented pilot-scale pressure swing adsorption process. The model captures nonisothermal effects as well as nonlinear adsorption and nitrogen coadsorption. Using the model and our apparatus, we have designed and studied a large number of cycles for CO2 capture. We demonstrate that by careful management of adsorption fronts and assembly of cycles based on understanding of the roles of individual steps, we are able to quickly assess the effect of adsorbents and process parameters on capture performance and identify optimal operating regimes and cycles. We recommend this approach in contrast to exhaustive parametric studies which tend to depend on specifics of the chosen cycle and adsorbent. We show that appropriate combinations of process steps can yield excellent process performance and demonstrate how the pressure drop, and heat loss, etc. affect process performance through their effect on adsorption fronts and profiles. Finally, cyclic temperature profiles along the adsorption column can be readily used to infer concentration profiles-this has proved to be a very useful tool in cyclic function definition. Our research reveals excellent promise for the application of pressure/vacuum swing adsorption technology in the arena of CO2 capture from flue gases.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/es0706854

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, J., & Webley, P. A.
Affiliations
CO2CRC (AU)
Corresponding author
Webley, Paul A.
Venue
Environmental Science & Technology
Published
2007-12-07
Volume
42
Issue
2
Pages
563-569
ISSN
  • 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5851
OpenAlex
W2053816437
Cited by
132
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 13
FWCI
13.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Environmental Science & Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Australian Government
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Industrial Gas Emission Control
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Adsorption and Cooling Systems
Keywords
CO2 capture, flue gas, vacuum swing adsorption, pressure swing adsorption, adsorption modeling, non-isothermal adsorption, adsorbent evaluation, pressure drop, heat loss, concentration profiles, carbon capture and storage
MeSH terms
Adsorption, Air Pollutants, Air Pollution, Carbon Dioxide, Models, Chemical, Vacuum

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review