The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Impact of Black Carbon in the Extraction and Mineralization of Phenanthrene in Soil
Abstract
During the past century, increased biomass burning and fossil fuel consumption have drastically increased the input of black carbon (BC) into the environment, and that has been shown to influence the behavior of organic contaminants in soil. A study was conducted to investigate the effects of BC on the relationship between aqueous hydroxypropyl-beta-cyclodextrin (HPCD) extraction and microbial mineralization (bioaccessibility) of 14C-phenanthrene (10 mg kg(-1)) in four soils amended with 0, 0.1, 0.5, 1, 2.5, and 5% (% dry wt soil) activated charcoal, a type of BC. Mineralisation was monitored over 20 d incubation, within respirometric assays, using an inoculum containing a phenanthrene-degrading pseudomonad and compared to HPCD extraction (24 h) using 50 mM aqueous solution; analyses were conducted after 1, 25, 50, and 100 d soil-phenanthrene contact time. Statistical analyses revealed that for each soil the addition of BC led to significant (P < 0.001) reductions in both HPCD extractability and microbial mineralization. Linear correlations for BC concentrations of 0% (r2 = 0.95; slope = 0.89) and 0.1% (r2 = 0.67; slope = 0.95) revealed a highly significant (P < 0.01) relationship between HPCD extractability and total mineralization (20 d), indicating a direct prediction of phenanthrene bioaccessibility by HPCD. However, in soils amended with 0.5, 1, 2.5, and 5% BC exhibited r2 values ranging 0.51-0.13 and slopes of 2.19-12.73. This study has shown that BC strongly sorbs phenanthrene causing reductions in extractability and, to a lesser extent, bioaccessibility to degrading microorganisms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Beesley, L., Moreno-Jiménez, E., Gomez-Eyles, J. L., Harris, E., Robinson, B., & Sizmur, T. (2011) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2011.07.023 · Cited by 1,610
Beesley, L., Moreno-Jiménez, E., & Gomez-Eyles, J. L. (2010) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2010.02.003 · Cited by 1,242
Yaashikaa, P. R., Kumar, P. S., Varjani, S., & Saravanan, A. (2020) · Biotechnology Reports · doi:10.1016/j.btre.2020.e00570 · Cited by 1,132
Characteristics and applications of biochar for environmental remediation: a review
Xie, T., Reddy, K. R., Wang, C., Yargicoglu, E., & Spokas, K. (2015) · Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/10643389.2014.924180 · Cited by 527
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons: A Critical Review of Environmental Occurrence and Bioremediation
Alegbeleye, O. O., Opeolu, B. O., & Jackson, V. A. (2017) · Environmental Management · doi:10.1007/s00267-017-0896-2 · Cited by 448
Metadata
- Authors
- Rhodes, A. H., Carlin, A., & Semple, K. T.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2008-01-03
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 740-745
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2044557969
- Cited by
- 198
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Impact of Black Carbon in the Extraction and Mineralization of Phenanthrene in Soil. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/es071451n
- The paper
- Rhodes, A. H., Carlin, A., & Semple, K. T. (2008). Impact of Black Carbon in the Extraction and Mineralization of Phenanthrene in Soil. Environmental Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1021/es071451n
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.