The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Body Loadings and Health Risk Assessment of Polychlorinated Dibenzo-p-dioxins and Dibenzofurans at an Intensive Electronic Waste Recycling Site in China
Open accessAbstract
This study is one of the very few investigating the dioxin body burden of a group of child-bearing-aged women at an electronic waste (e-waste) recycling site (Taizhou, Zhejiang Province) (24 +/- 2.83 years of age, 40% were primiparae) and a reference site (Lin'an city, Zhejiang Province, about 245 km away from Taizhou) (24 +/- 2.35 years of age, 100% were primiparae) in China. Five sets of samples (each set consisted of human milk, placenta, and hair) were collected from each site. Body burdens of people from the e-waste processing site (human milk, 21.02 +/- 13.81 pg WHO-TEQ1998/g fat (World Health Organization toxic equivalency 1998); placenta, 31.15 +/- 15.67 pg WHO-TEQ1998/g fat; hair, 33.82 +/- 17.74 pg WHO-TEQ1998/g dry wt) showed significantly higher levels of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and polychlorinated dibenzofurans (PCDD/ Fs) than those from the reference site (human milk, 9.35 +/- 7.39 pg WHO-TEQ1998/g fat; placenta, 11.91 +/- 7.05 pg WHO-TEQ1998/g fat; hair, 5.59 +/- 4.36 pg WHO-TEQ1998/g dry wt) and were comparatively higher than other studies. The difference between the two sites was due to e-waste recycling operations, for example, open burning, which led to high background levels. Moreover, mothers from the e-waste recycling site consumed more foods of animal origin. The estimated daily intake of PCDD/Fs within 6 months by breastfed infants from the e-waste processing site was 2 times higher than that from the reference site. Both values exceeded the WHO tolerable daily intake for adults by at least 25 and 11 times, respectively. Our results implicated that e-waste recycling operations cause prominent PCDD/F levels in the environment and in humans. The elevated body burden may have health implications for the next generation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Non-invasive matrices in human biomonitoring: A review
Esteban, M., & Castaño, A. (2009) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2008.09.003 · Cited by 567
Informal electronic waste recycling: A sector review with special focus on China
Chi, X., Streicher-Porte, M., Wang, M. Y. L., & Reuter, M. A. (2011) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2010.11.006 · Cited by 497
E-Waste Recycling: Where Does It Go from Here?
Zhang, K., Schnoor, J. L., & Zeng, E. Y. (2012) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es303166s · Cited by 388
Developmental Neurotoxicants in E-Waste: An Emerging Health Concern
Chen, A., Dietrich, K. N., Huo, X., & Ho, S.-M. (2011) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.1002452 · Cited by 358
Organophosphate ester flame retardants and plasticizers in human placenta in Eastern China
Ding, J., Xu, Z., Huang, W., Feng, L., & Yang, F. (2016) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.02.171 · Cited by 285
Metadata
- Authors
- Chan, Xing, G. H., Xu, Y., Liang, Y., Chen, L. X., Wu, S. C., Wong, C. K. C., Leung, C. K. M., & Wong, M. H.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2007-10-06
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 7668-7674
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2081434449
- Cited by
- 201
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Body Loadings and Health Risk Assessment of Polychlorinated Dibenzo-p-dioxins and Dibenzofurans at an Intensive Electronic Waste Recycling Site in China. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/es071492j
- The paper
- Chan, Xing, G. H., Xu, Y., Liang, Y., Chen, L. X., Wu, S. C., Wong, C. K. C., Leung, C. K. M., & Wong, M. H. (2007). Body Loadings and Health Risk Assessment of Polychlorinated Dibenzo-p-dioxins and Dibenzofurans at an Intensive Electronic Waste Recycling Site in China. Environmental Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1021/es071492j
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.