The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Gulf of Mexico Hypoxia: Alternate States and a Legacy
Abstract
A 20+ year data set of the size of the hypoxic zone off the Louisiana-Texas coast is analyzed to reveal insights about what causes variation in the size of the hypoxic zone in summer, the accumulation of carbon storage in sediments, and pelagic and sediment oxygen demand. The results of models support the conclusion that some of this variation can be explained by a higher sedimentary oxygen demand, which may be larger than water column respiration rates in summer. Proxies for organic loading to sediments reveal that carbon losses continue after accumulation, and results from other studies indicate that sediment oxygen demand is directly related to surface water phytoplankton production, which has increased because of higher nutrient loading from the Mississippi River watershed. The potential size of the hypoxic zone for a given nitrogen load has increased as a result and has doubled from 1980 to 2000. The development of widespread hypoxia after the early 1980s and its consequences could, therefore, be considered a shift to an alternate ecosystem state. The Action Plan for Reducing, Mitigating, and Controlling Hypoxia in the Northern Gulf of Mexico goal of reducing the size of the hypoxic zone to an average of 5000 km2 by 2015 becomes more difficult to achieve for every year there is no significant reduction in nutrient loading. The decisions made to reduce the size of the hypoxic zone must incorporate these nonlinear responses and, we think, err on the side of caution in assuming that existing management efforts are sufficient to restore water quality on this shelf. The legacy of a higher sediment respiratory demand following eutrophication should apply to other coastal systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Spreading dead zones and consequences for marine ecosystems
Diaz, R. J., & Rosenberg, R. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1156401 · Cited by 6,626
Thresholds of hypoxia for marine biodiversity
Vaquer-Sunyer, R., & Duarte, C. M. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0803833105 · Cited by 1,971
Polasky, S., Nelson, E., Pennington, D., & Johnson, K. A. (2011) · Environmental and Resource Economics · doi:10.1007/s10640-010-9407-0 · Cited by 731
Ecological extinction and evolution in the brave new ocean
Jackson, J. B. C. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0802812105 · Cited by 611
Decision-making under great uncertainty: environmental management in an era of global change
Polasky, S., Carpenter, S. R., Folke, C., & Keeler, B. (2011) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2011.04.007 · Cited by 560
Metadata
- Authors
- Turner, R. E., Rabalais, N. N., & Justic, D.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2008-02-20
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 2323-2327
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2086676220
- Cited by
- 408
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 22.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gulf of Mexico Hypoxia: Alternate States and a Legacy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/es071617k
- The paper
- Turner, R. E., Rabalais, N. N., & Justic, D. (2008). Gulf of Mexico Hypoxia: Alternate States and a Legacy. Environmental Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1021/es071617k
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.