The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Exergy: Its Potential and Limitations in Environmental Science and Technology
Abstract
New technologies, either renewables-based or not, are confronted with both economic and technical constraints. Their development takes advantage of considering the basic laws of economics and thermodynamics. With respect to the latter, the exergy concept pops up. Although its fundamentals, that is, the Second Law of Thermodynamics, were already established in the 1800s, it is only in the last years that the exergy concept has gained a more widespread interest in process analysis, typically employed to identify inefficiencies. However, exergy analysis today is implemented far beyond technical analysis; it is also employed in environmental, (thermo)economic, and even sustainability analysis of industrial systems. Because natural ecosystems are also subjected to the basic laws of thermodynamics, it is another subject of exergy analysis. After an introduction on the concept itself, this review focuses on the potential and limitations of the exergy conceptin (1) ecosystem analysis, utilized to describe maximum storage and maximum dissipation of energy flows (2); industrial system analysis: from single process analysis to complete process chain analysis (3); (thermo)economic analysis, with extended exergy accounting; and (4) environmental impact assessment throughout the whole life cycle with quantification of the resource intake and emission effects. Apart from technical system analysis, it proves that exergy as a tool in environmental impact analysis may be the most mature field of application, particularly with respect to resource and efficiency accounting, one of the major challenges in the development of sustainable technology. Far less mature is the exergy analysis of natural ecosystems and the coupling with economic analysis, where a lively debate is presently going on about the actual merits of an exergy-based approach.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Maximum entropy production principle in physics, chemistry and biology
Martyushev, L. M., & Seleznev, V. D. (2006) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2005.12.001 · Cited by 943
Combining pinch and exergy analysis for process modifications
Feng, X., & Zhu, X. X. (1997) · Applied Thermal Engineering · doi:10.1016/s1359-4311(96)00035-x · Cited by 130
Cited by
Dakpo, K. H., Jeanneaux, P., & Latruffe, L. (2016) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2015.07.024 · Cited by 321
The environmental sustainability of microalgae as feed for aquaculture: a life cycle perspective
Taelman, S. E., De Meester, S., Roef, L., Michiels, M., & Dewulf, J. (2013) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2013.08.044 · Cited by 107
Self-citationTaelman, S. E., Champenois, J., Edwards, M. D., De Meester, S., & Dewulf, J. (2015) · Algal Research · doi:10.1016/j.algal.2015.06.018 · Cited by 78
Self-citationRisse, M., Weber-Blaschke, G., & Richter, K. (2017) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.07.045 · Cited by 66
Vogtländer, J., Peck, D., & Kurowicka, D. (2019) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su11082446 · Cited by 26
Metadata
- Authors
- Dewulf, J., Van Langenhove, H., Muys, B., Bruers, S., Bakshi, B. R., Grubb, G. F., Paulus, D. M., & Sciubba, E.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2008-02-27
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 2221-2232
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2042118827
- Cited by
- 327
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 17.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.