Cited by 66Sustainability and Ecological Systems AnalysisEnvironmental Impact and SustainabilityAgricultural and Food Sciences

Resource efficiency of multifunctional wood cascade chains using LCA and exergy analysis, exemplified by a case study for Germany

Open access
Risse, Michael, Weber-Blaschke, Gabriele, Richter, Klaus·2017·Resources, Conservation and Recycling

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.07.045

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The most important environmental benefit of increased wood cascading comes from the avoidance of resource extraction from the natural environment, particularly from the avoided primary production of round wood.

    “In contrast, Risse et al. (2017) conclude that the most important environmental benefit of increased wood cascading comes from the avoidance of resource extraction from the natural environment and, in particular, “from the avoided primary production of round wood.””

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Risse, M., Weber-Blaschke, G., & Richter, K.
Affiliations
Technical University of Munich (DE)
Corresponding author
Risse, Michael
Venue
Resources, Conservation and Recycling
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-11
Volume
126
Pages
141-152
ISSN
0921-3449 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2743158758
Cited by
66
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4
FWCI
2.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Resources Conservation and Recycling (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • mediaTUM – the media and publications repository of the Technical University Munich (Technical University Munich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
German Ministry of Food and Agriculture (FKZ 22005114)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Sustainability and Ecological Systems Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Agricultural and Food Sciences
Keywords
resource efficiency, exergy analysis, timber supply, resource consumption

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review