The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Tailoring the Structure of Thin Film Nanocomposite Membranes to Achieve Seawater RO Membrane Performance
Abstract
Herein we report on the formation and characterization of pure polyamide thin film composite (TFC) and zeolite-polyamide thin film nanocomposite (TFN) reverse osmosis (RO) membranes. Four different physical-chemical post-treatment combinations were applied after the interfacial polymerization reaction to change the molecular structure of polyamide and zeolite-polyamide thin films. Both TFC and TFN hand-cast membranes were more permeable, hydrophilic, and rough than a commercial seawater RO membrane. Salt rejection by TFN membranes was consistently below that of hand-cast TFC membranes; however, two TFN membranes exhibited 32 g/L NaCl rejections above 99.4%, which was better than the commercial membrane under the test conditions employed. The nearly defect-free TFN films that produced such high rejections were achieved only with wet curing, regardless of other post-treatments. Polyamide films formed in the presence of zeolite nanoparticles were less cross-linked than similarly cast pure polyamide films. At the very low nanoparticle loadings evaluated, differences between pure polyamide and zeolite-polyamide membrane water and salt permeability correlated weakly with extent of cross-linking of the polyamide film, which suggests that defects and molecular-sieving largely govern transport through zeolite-polyamide thin film nanocomposite membranes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Applications of nanotechnology in water and wastewater treatment
Qu, X., Alvarez, P. J. J., & Li, Q. (2013) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2012.09.058 · Cited by 2,444
A review of water treatment membrane nanotechnologies
Pendergast, M. M., & Hoek, E. M. V. (2011) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c0ee00541j · Cited by 2,078
Self-citationMolecular Separation with Organic Solvent Nanofiltration: A Critical Review
Marchetti, P., Jimenez Solomon, M. F., Szekely, G., & Livingston, A. G. (2014) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr500006j · Cited by 1,758
Materials for next-generation molecularly selective synthetic membranes
Koros, W. J., & Zhang, C. (2017) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat4805 · Cited by 1,199
A review on membrane fabrication: Structure, properties and performance relationship
Lalia, B. S., Kochkodan, V., Hashaikeh, R., & Hilal, N. (2013) · Desalination · doi:10.1016/j.desal.2013.06.016 · Cited by 1,109
Polymer-matrix nanocomposite membranes for water treatment
Yin, J., & Deng, B. (2015) · Journal of Membrane Science · doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2014.11.019 · Cited by 1,089
A Review of Removal of Pollutants from Water/Wastewater Using Different Types of Nanomaterials
Amin, M. T., Alazba, A. A., & Manzoor, U. (2014) · Advances in Materials Science and Engineering · doi:10.1155/2014/825910 · Cited by 645
A review on RO membrane technology: Developments and challenges
Shenvi, S. S., Isloor, A. M., & Ismail, A. F. (2015) · Desalination · doi:10.1016/j.desal.2014.12.042 · Cited by 592
Current trends in interfacial polymerization chemistry
Raaijmakers, M. J. T., & Benes, N. E. (2016) · Progress in Polymer Science · doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2016.06.004 · Cited by 435
Xu, G.-R., Wang, J.-N., & Li, C.-J. (2013) · Desalination · doi:10.1016/j.desal.2013.08.022 · Cited by 277
Rajaeian, B., Rahimpour, A., Tade, M. O., & Liu, S. (2013) · Desalination · doi:10.1016/j.desal.2012.12.012 · Cited by 270
Nanotechnology and its Application in Wastewater Treatment
Singh, N., Malik, M. A., & Hashmi, A. A. (2021) · Sustainable Practices in the Textile Industry · doi:10.1002/9781119818915.ch13 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Lind, M. L., Eumine Suk, D., Nguyen, T.-V., & Hoek, E. M. V.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2010-10-13
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 21
- Pages
- 8230-8235
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2080092908
- Cited by
- 214
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.