The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sustainability Metrics: Life Cycle Assessment and Green Design in Polymers
Abstract
This study evaluates the efficacy of green design principles such as the "12 Principles of Green Chemistry," and the "12 Principles of Green Engineering" with respect to environmental impacts found using life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology. A case study of 12 polymers is presented, seven derived from petroleum, four derived from biological sources, and one derived from both. The environmental impacts of each polymer's production are assessed using LCA methodology standardized by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO). Each polymer is also assessed for its adherence to green design principles using metrics generated specifically for this paper. Metrics include atom economy, mass from renewable sources, biodegradability, percent recycled, distance of furthest feedstock, price, life cycle health hazards and life cycle energy use. A decision matrix is used to generate single value metrics for each polymer evaluating either adherence to green design principles or life-cycle environmental impacts. Results from this study show a qualified positive correlation between adherence to green design principles and a reduction of the environmental impacts of production. The qualification results from a disparity between biopolymers and petroleum polymers. While biopolymers rank highly in terms of green design, they exhibit relatively large environmental impacts from production. Biopolymers rank 1, 2, 3, and 4 based on green design metrics; however they rank in the middle of the LCA rankings. Polyolefins rank 1, 2, and 3 in the LCA rankings, whereas complex polymers, such as PET, PVC, and PC place at the bottom of both ranking systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Use of U.S. Croplands for Biofuels Increases Greenhouse Gases Through Emissions from Land-Use Change
Searchinger, T., Heimlich, R., Houghton, R. A., Dong, F., Elobeid, A., Fabiosa, J., Tokgoz, S., Hayes, D., & Yu, T.-H. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1151861 · Cited by 4,888
Cited by
Polymer-Based Organic Batteries
Muench, S., Wild, A., Friebe, C., Häupler, B., Janoschka, T., & Schubert, U. S. (2016) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00070 · Cited by 1,163
Catalysis as an Enabling Science for Sustainable Polymers
Zhang, X., Fevre, M., Jones, G. O., & Waymouth, R. M. (2018) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00329 · Cited by 936
Environmental performance of bio-based and biodegradable plastics: the road ahead
Lambert, S., & Wagner, M. (2017) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c7cs00149e · Cited by 838
From Multisite Polymerization Catalysis to Sustainable Materials and All-Polyolefin Composites
Stürzel, M., Mihan, S., & Mülhaupt, R. (2016) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00310 · Cited by 822
Ethyl lactate as a solvent: Properties, applications and production processes – a review
Pereira, C. S. M., Silva, V. M. T. M., & Rodrigues, A. E. (2011) · Green Chemistry · doi:10.1039/c1gc15523g · Cited by 544
Metadata
- Authors
- Tabone, M. D., Cregg, J. J., Beckman, E. J., & Landis, A. E.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2010-09-24
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 21
- Pages
- 8264-8269
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2014361844
- Cited by
- 416
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 14.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.