The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Recent Advances in Environmental Risk Assessment of Transformation Products
Abstract
When micropollutants degrade in the environment, they may form persistent and toxic transformation products, which should be accounted for in the environmental risk assessment of the parent compounds. Transformation products have become a topic of interest not only with regard to their formation in the environment, but also during advanced water treatment processes, where disinfection byproducts can form from benign precursors. In addition, environmental risk assessment of human and veterinary pharmaceuticals requires inclusion of human metabolites as most pharmaceuticals are not excreted into wastewater in their original form, but are extensively metabolized. All three areas have developed their independent approaches to assess the risk associated with transformation product formation including hazard identification, exposure assessment, hazard assessment including dose-response characterization, and risk characterization. This review provides an overview and defines a link among those areas, emphasizing commonalities and encouraging a common approach. We distinguish among approaches to assess transformation products of individual pollutants that are undergoing a particular transformation process, e.g., biotransformation or (photo)oxidation, and approaches with the goal of prioritizing transformation products in terms of their contribution to environmental risk. We classify existing approaches for transformation product assessment in degradation studies as exposure- or effect-driven. In the exposure-driven approach, transformation products are identified and quantified by chemical analysis followed by effect assessment. In the effect-driven approach, a reaction mixture undergoes toxicity testing. If the decrease in toxicity parallels the decrease of parent compound concentration, the transformation products are considered to be irrelevant, and only when toxicity increases or the decrease is not proportional to the parent compound concentration are the TPs identified. For prioritization of transformation products in terms of their contribution to overall environmental risk, we integrate existing research into a coherent model-based, risk-driven framework. In the proposed framework, read-across from data of the parent compound to the transformation products is emphasized, but limitations to this approach are also discussed. Most prominently, we demonstrate how effect data for parent compounds can be used in combination with analysis of toxicophore structures and bioconcentration potential to facilitate transformation product effect assessment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Krauss, M., Singer, H., & Hollender, J. (2010) · Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry · doi:10.1007/s00216-010-3608-9 · Cited by 743
Cited by
Fluoroquinolone antibiotics: An emerging class of environmental micropollutants
Van Doorslaer, X., Dewulf, J., Van Langenhove, H., & Demeestere, K. (2014) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.08.075 · Cited by 819
Feng, L., van Hullebusch, E. D., Rodrigo, M. A., Esposito, G., & Oturan, M. A. (2013) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2013.05.061 · Cited by 543
Zhou, S., Di Paolo, C., Wu, X., Shao, Y., Seiler, T.-B., & Hollert, H. (2019) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2019.04.034 · Cited by 360
Environmental Side Effects of Pharmaceutical Cocktails: What We Know and What We Should Know
Vasquez, M. I., Lambrianides, A., Schneider, M., Kümmerer, K., & Fatta-Kassinos, D. (2014) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.06.069 · Cited by 295
Daughton, C. G. (2016) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.03.109 · Cited by 177
Metadata
- Authors
- Escher, B. I., & Fenner, K.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2011-04-07
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 3835-3847
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2071430420
- Cited by
- 501
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 26.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.