Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 227

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Regional Characterization of Freshwater Use in LCA: Modeling Direct Impacts on Human Health

Boulay, Anne-Marie, Bulle, Cécile, Bayart, Jean-Baptiste, Deschênes, Louise, Margni, Manuele·2011·Environmental Science & Technology

Abstract

Life cycle assessment (LCA) is a methodology that quantifies potential environmental impacts for comparative purposes in a decision-making context. While potential environmental impacts from pollutant emissions into water are characterized in LCA, impacts from water unavailability are not yet fully quantified. Water use can make the resource unavailable to other users by displacement or quality degradation. A reduction in water availability to human users can potentially affect human health. If financial resources are available, there can be adaptations that may, in turn, shift the environmental burdens to other life cycle stages and impact categories. This paper proposes a model to evaluate these potential impacts in an LCA context. It considers the water that is withdrawn and released, its quality and scarcity in order to evaluate the loss of functionality associated with water uses. Regionalized results are presented for impacts on human health for two modeling approaches regarding affected users, including or not domestic uses, and expressed in disability-adjusted life years (DALY). A consumption and quality based scarcity indicator is also proposed as a midpoint. An illustrative example is presented for the production of corrugated board with different effluents, demonstrating the importance of considering quality, process effluents and the difference between the modeling approaches.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/es1030883

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. Milà i Canals, 2009, Assessing freshwater use impacts in LCA: Part Iinventory modelling and characterisation factors for the main impact pathways, Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 14, 28, 10.1007/s11367-008-0030-z · DOI · Paper page
  2. Hauschild, 2005, Assessing environmental impacts in a life-cycle perspective, Environ. Sci. Technol., 39, 81A, 10.1021/es053190s · DOI · Paper page
  3. Bayart, 2010, Framework for assessment of off-stream freshwater use within LCA, Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 15, 439, 10.1007/s11367-010-0172-7 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Pfister, 2009, Assessing the environmental impacts of freshwater consumption in LCA, Environ. Sci. Technol., 43, 4098, 10.1021/es802423e · DOI · Paper page
  5. Motoshita, 2010, Development of impact factors on damage to health by infectious diseases caused by domestic water scarcity, Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 16, 65, 10.1007/s11367-010-0236-8 · DOI
  6. Fry, 2010, Quantifying health improvements from water quantity enhancement: An engineering perspective applied to rainwater harvesting in West Africa, Environ. Sci. Technol., 44, 9535, 10.1021/es100798j · DOI · Paper page
  7. Falkenmark, 2000, Competing freshwater and ecological services in the river basin perspective: An expanded conceptual framework, Water International, 25, 6, 10.1080/02508060008686815 · DOI
  8. Boulay, 2010, Categorizing water for LCA inventory, Int. J. Life Cycle Assess.
  9. Döll, 2009, Vulnerability to the impact of climate change on renewable groundwater resources: a global-scale assessment, Environ. Res. Lett., 4, 12, 10.1088/1748-9326/4/3/035006 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Alcamo, 2003, Development and testing of the WaterGAP 2 global model of water use and availability, Hydrol. Sci. J., 48, 317, 10.1623/hysj.48.3.317.45290 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Alcamo, 2000, World Water in 2025Global Modeling and Scenario Analysis for the World Commission on Water for the 21st Century
  12. Vorosmarty, 2000, Global water resources: Vulnerability from climate change and population growth, Science, 289, 284, 10.1126/science.289.5477.284 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 2008, Data and StatisticsCountry Classification
  14. 2009, The United Nations World Water Development Report 3: Water in a Changing World
  15. 2003, The United Nation Water Development Program “Water for People, Water for Life
  16. Howard, 2003, Domestic Water Quantity, Service Level and Health
  17. Jolliet, 2003, IMPACT 2002+: A new life cycle impact assessment methodology, Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 8, 324, 10.1007/BF02978505 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Frischknecht, 2008, Swiss Ecological Scarcity Method
  19. Weidema, 1999, Marginal production technologies for life cycle inventories, Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 4, 48, 10.1007/BF02979395 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 227

Metadata

Authors
Boulay, A.-M., Bulle, C., Bayart, J.-B., Deschênes, L., & Margni, M.
Venue
Environmental Science & Technology
Published
2011-09-23
Volume
45
Issue
20
Pages
8948-8957
ISSN
  • 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5851
OpenAlex
W1988205435
Cited by
227
References
0
FWCI
13.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Regional Characterization of Freshwater Use in LCA: Modeling Direct Impacts on Human Health. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/es1030883
The paper
Boulay, A.-M., Bulle, C., Bayart, J.-B., Deschênes, L., & Margni, M. (2011). Regional Characterization of Freshwater Use in LCA: Modeling Direct Impacts on Human Health. Environmental Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1021/es1030883

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.