Cited by 10Environmental Impact and SustainabilityWater-Energy-Food Nexus StudiesSustainability and Ecological Systems Analysis

Water footprinting in life cycle assessment: how to count the drops and assess the impacts?

Berger, Markus, Pfister, Stephan, Motoshita, Masaharu·2016·LCA Compendium – The Complete World of Life Cycle Assessment

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-94-017-7610-3_3

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Berger, M., Pfister, S., & Motoshita, M.
Affiliations
  • Technische Universität Berlin (DE)
  • ETH Zurich (CH)
  • Research Institute of Science for Safety and Sustainability (JP)
Corresponding author
Berger, Markus
Venue
LCA Compendium – The Complete World of Life Cycle Assessment
Published
2016
Pages
73-114
ISSN
  • 2214-3505 (ISSN-L)
  • 2214-3513
OpenAlex
W2482295003
Cited by
10
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
2.30
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
LCA compendium (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Water-Energy-Food Nexus Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Sustainability and Ecological Systems Analysis
Keywords
water footprinting, freshwater scarcity, disability-adjusted life years, water quality, sustainable decision-making

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review