The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Formation and Decomposition of New and Unknown Polar Brominated Disinfection Byproducts during Chlorination
Abstract
Brominated disinfection byproducts (Br-DBPs) are generally more cytotoxic and genotoxic than their chlorinated analogues. A great portion of total organic bromine in chlorinated drinking water is still unknown and may be ascribed to polar Br-DBPs. In this work, a novel approach, precursor ion scan using ultra-performance liquid chromatography/electrospray ionization-triple quadrupole mass spectrometry, was adopted and further developed for selective detection and identification of polar Br-DBPs, which made it possible to reveal the whole picture of the formation and decomposition of polar Br-DBPs during chlorination. Simulated drinking water samples with chlorine contact times from 1 min to 7 d were analyzed. Many new polar aromatic and unsaturated aliphatic Br-DBPs were detected and tentatively proposed with chemical structures, of which 2,4,6-tribromophenol, 3,5-dibromo-4-hydroxybenzoic acid, 2,6-dibromo-1,4-hydroquinone, and 3,3-dibromopropenoic acid were confirmed or identified with authentic standards. It was found that various polar Br-DBPs formed and reached the maximum levels at different chlorine contact times; high molecular weight Br-DBPs might undergo decomposition to relatively low molecular weight Br-DBPs or even finally to haloacetic acids and trihalomethanes. The decomposition of newly detected intermediate Br-DBPs (including molecular ion cluster m/z 345/347/349/351, 2,4,6-tribromophenol, and 3,5-dibromo-4-hydroxybenzoic acid) during chlorination was investigated in detail. The "black box" from the input of "humic substances + bromide + chlorine" through the output of "haloacetic acids + trihalomethanes" was opened to a significant extent.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
RICHARDSON, S., PLEWA, M., WAGNER, E., SCHOENY, R., & DEMARINI, D. (2007) · Mutation Research/Reviews in Mutation Research · doi:10.1016/j.mrrev.2007.09.001 · Cited by 3,317
Occurrence of a new generation of disinfection byproducts†
Krasner, S. W., Weinberg, H. S., Richardson, S. D., Pastor, S. J., Chinn, R., Sclimenti, M. J., Onstad, G. D., & Thruston, A. D. (2006) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es060353j · Cited by 1,633
Cited by
Li, X.-F., & Mitch, W. A. (2018) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.7b05440 · Cited by 1,020
Environmental Mass Spectrometry: Emerging Contaminants and Current Issues
Richardson, S. D. (2012) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac202903d · Cited by 323
Jiang, J., Zhang, X., Zhu, X., & Li, Y. (2017) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.6b06161 · Cited by 293
Self-citationJiang, J., Han, J., & Zhang, X. (2020) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.9b06403 · Cited by 284
Self-citationEvaluation of Histidine Reactivity and Byproduct Formation During Peptide Chlorination
Choe, J. K., Hua, L.-C., Komaki, Y., Simpson, A. M.-A., McCurry, D. L., & Mitch, W. A. (2021) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.0c07408 · Cited by 36
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhai, H., & Zhang, X.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2011-02-16
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 2194-2201
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2313083755
- Cited by
- 298
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.