Cited by 891Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental ImpactEnvironmental Impact and SustainabilityInsect Utilization and Effects

Environmental impacts of cultured meat production

Tuomisto, Hanna L., Teixeira de Mattos, M. Joost·2011·Environmental Science & Technology

Abstract

Cultured meat (i.e., meat produced in vitro using tissue engineering techniques) is being developed as a potentially healthier and more efficient alternative to conventional meat. Life cycle assessment (LCA) research method was used for assessing environmental impacts of large-scale cultured meat production. Cyanobacteria hydrolysate was assumed to be used as the nutrient and energy source for muscle cell growth. The results showed that production of 1000 kg cultured meat requires 26-33 GJ energy, 367-521 m(3) water, 190-230 m(2) land, and emits 1900-2240 kg CO(2)-eq GHG emissions. In comparison to conventionally produced European meat, cultured meat involves approximately 7-45% lower energy use (only poultry has lower energy use), 78-96% lower GHG emissions, 99% lower land use, and 82-96% lower water use depending on the product compared. Despite high uncertainty, it is concluded that the overall environmental impacts of cultured meat production are substantially lower than those of conventionally produced meat.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/es200130u

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Belay A., 1997, Spirulina platensis (Arthrospira): Physiology, Cell-Biology and Biotechnology, 131
  2. Chapagain, A. K.; Hoekstra, A. Y.Virtual water trade: A quantification of virtual water flows between nations in relation to international trade of livestock and livestock products. In Virtual water trade. Proceedings of the International Expert MEeting on Virtual Water Trade. Value of Water Research Report Series No. 12 ;Hoekstra, A. Y., Ed.IHE: Delft; 2003, p244.
  3. Tuomisto H. L., 2009, Aspects of Applied Biology, 93

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tuomisto, H. L., & Teixeira de Mattos, M. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Oxford, Wildlife Conservation Research Unit, The Recanati-Kaplan Centre, Tubney House, Abingdon Road, Tubney, Oxon OX13 5QL, U.K.
  • University of Amsterdam, Swammerdam Institute for Life Sciences, Molecular Microbial Physiology Group, NL-1018 WV Amsterdam, Netherlands
Venue
Environmental Science & Technology
Published
2011-06-17
Volume
45
Issue
14
Pages
6117-6123
ISSN
  • 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5851
OpenAlex
W2332797918
Cited by
891
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 86 · 2025: 122 · 2024: 114 · 2023: 99 · 2022: 101 · 2021: 85 · 2020: 60 · 2019: 66 · 2018: 51 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 6
FWCI
11.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Environmental Science & Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect Utilization and Effects
Keywords
cultured meat, environmental impact, life cycle assessment, greenhouse gas emissions, energy consumption, water consumption, land use, sustainable protein production
MeSH terms
Cyanobacteria, California, Carbon Dioxide, Conservation of Energy Resources, Environment, Food Handling, Food Technology, Meat, Protein Hydrolysates, Spain, Temperature, Thailand, Water Supply, Tissue Engineering

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review