Cited by 289Carbon Dioxide Capture TechnologiesZeolite Catalysis and SynthesisAdsorption and Cooling Systems

CO2 Capture from the Atmosphere and Simultaneous Concentration Using Zeolites and Amine-Grafted SBA-15

Stuckert, Amy Nicki, Yang, Ralph T.·2011·Environmental Science & Technology

Abstract

CO(2) capture from the atmosphere and concentration by cyclic adsorption-desorption processes are studied for the first time. New high microporosity materials, zeolite types Li-LSX and K-LSX, are compared to zeolite NaX and amine-grafted SBA-15 with low amine content. Breakthrough performance showed low silica type X (LSX) to have the most promise for application in dry conditions and capable of high space velocities of at least 63,000 h(-1), with minimal spreading of the CO(2) breakthrough curve. Amine-grafted silica was the only adsorbent able to operate in wet conditions, but at a lower space velocity of 1500 h(-1), due to slower uptake rates. The results illustrate that the uptake rate is as important as the equilibrium adsorbed amount in determining the cyclic process performance. Li-LSX was found to have double the capacity of zeolite NaX at atmospheric conditions, also higher than all other reported zeolites. It is further demonstrated that by using a combined temperature and vacuum swing cycle, the CO(2) concentration in the desorption product is >90% for all adsorbents in pellet form. This is the first report of such high CO(2) product concentrations from a single cycle, using atmospheric air.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/es202647a

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • DAC on zeolites has been studied and most works point at commercial and, in general, aluminosilicate zeolites not being promising adsorbents for this application due to water adsorption.

    “DAC on zeolites has been studied and most of the works point at commercial and, in general, aluminosilicate zeolites not being promising adsorbents for this application due to water adsorption.534,537−539”
  • Li-LSX, K-LSX and 13X experience a 99, 88 and 100% drop in CO2 capacity at 80% relative humidity, respectively.

    “In fact, a paper by Stuckert et al. showed that Li-LSX, K-LSX and 13X experience a 99, 88 and 100% drop in CO2 capacity at 80% relative humidity, respectively.537”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stuckert, A. N., & Yang, R. T.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Yang, Ralph T.
Venue
Environmental Science & Technology
Published
2011-10-27
Volume
45
Issue
23
Pages
10257-10264
ISSN
  • 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5851
OpenAlex
W2328088879
Cited by
289
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 10
FWCI
27.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Environmental Science & Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Inorganic Chemistry › Zeolite Catalysis and Synthesis
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Adsorption and Cooling Systems
Keywords
CO2 capture, atmospheric CO2 concentration, zeolite 13X, adsorption-desorption cycles, wet conditions, vacuum swing adsorption, temperature swing adsorption
MeSH terms
Amines, Carbon Dioxide, Silicon Dioxide, Zeolites

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review