The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Predictive Environmental Risk Assessment of Chemical Mixtures: A Conceptual Framework
Abstract
Environmental risks of chemicals are still often assessed substance-by-substance, neglecting mixture effects. This may result in risk underestimations, as the typical exposure is toward multicomponent chemical "cocktails". We use the two well established mixture toxicity concepts (Concentration Addition (CA) and Independent Action (IA)) for providing a tiered outline for environmental hazard and risk assessments of mixtures, focusing on general industrial chemicals and assuming that the "base set" of data (EC50s for algae, crustaceans, fish) is available. As mixture toxicities higher than predicted by CA are rare findings, we suggest applying CA as a precautious first tier, irrespective of the modes/mechanisms of action of the mixture components. In particular, we prove that summing up PEC/PNEC ratios might serve as a justifiable CA-approximation, in order to estimate in a first tier assessment whether there is a potential risk for an exposed ecosystem if only base-set data are available. This makes optimum use of existing single substance assessments as more demanding mixture investigations are requested only if there are first indications of an environmental risk. Finally we suggest to call for mode-of-action driven analyses only if error estimations indicate the possibility for substantial differences between CA- and IA-based assessments.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kolpin, D. W., Furlong, E. T., Meyer, M. T., Thurman, E. M., Zaugg, S. D., Barber, L. B., & Buxton, H. T. (2002) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es011055j · Cited by 7,953
Cited by
Bradley, P. M., Journey, C. A., Romanok, K. M., Barber, L. B., Buxton, H. T., Foreman, W. T., Furlong, E. T., Glassmeyer, S. T., Hladik, M. L., Iwanowicz, L. R., et al. (2017) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.7b00012 · Cited by 330
Environmental Side Effects of Pharmaceutical Cocktails: What We Know and What We Should Know
Vasquez, M. I., Lambrianides, A., Schneider, M., Kümmerer, K., & Fatta-Kassinos, D. (2014) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.06.069 · Cited by 295
Ojo, A. F., Peng, C., & Ng, J. C. (2021) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.124863 · Cited by 221
Rasmussen, J. J., Wiberg-Larsen, P., Baattrup-Pedersen, A., Cedergreen, N., McKnight, U. S., Kreuger, J., Jacobsen, D., Kristensen, E. A., & Friberg, N. (2015) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2015.07.021 · Cited by 195
Borg, D., Lund, B.-O., Lindquist, N.-G., & Håkansson, H. (2013) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2013.05.009 · Cited by 155
Metadata
- Authors
- Backhaus, T., & Faust, M.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2012-02-22
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 2564-2573
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2006833903
- Cited by
- 884
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 28.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Predictive Environmental Risk Assessment of Chemical Mixtures: A Conceptual Framework. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/es2034125
- The paper
- Backhaus, T., & Faust, M. (2012). Predictive Environmental Risk Assessment of Chemical Mixtures: A Conceptual Framework. Environmental Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1021/es2034125
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.