The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Thresholds for the Effects of Pesticides on Invertebrate Communities and Leaf Breakdown in Stream Ecosystems
Open accessAbstract
We compiled data from eight field studies conducted between 1998 and 2010 in Europe, Siberia, and Australia to derive thresholds for the effects of pesticides on macroinvertebrate communities and the ecosystem function leaf breakdown. Dose-response models for the relationship of pesticide toxicity with the abundance of sensitive macroinvertebrate taxa showed significant differences to reference sites at 1/1000 to 1/10,000 of the median acute effect concentration (EC50) for Daphnia magna, depending on the model specification and whether forested upstream sections were present. Hence, the analysis revealed effects well below the threshold of 1/100 of the EC50 for D. magna incorporated in the European Union Uniform Principles (UP) for registration of single pesticides. Moreover, the abundances of sensitive macroinvertebrates in the communities were reduced by 27% to 61% at concentrations related to 1/100 of the EC50 for D. magna. The invertebrate leaf breakdown rate was positively linearly related to the abundance of pesticide-sensitive macroinvertebrate species in the communities, though only for two of the three countries examined. We argue that the low effect thresholds observed were not mainly because of an underestimation of field exposure or confounding factors. From the results gathered we derive that the UP threshold for single pesticides based on D. magna is not protective for field communities subject to multiple stressors, pesticide mixtures, and repeated exposures and that risk mitigation measures, such as forested landscape patches, can alleviate effects of pesticides.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Beyond species: functional diversity and the maintenance of ecological processes and services
Cadotte, M. W., Carscadden, K., & Mirotchnick, N. (2011) · Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2011.02048.x · Cited by 2,396
Poff, N. L. (1997) · Journal of the North American Benthological Society · doi:10.2307/1468026 · Cited by 1,833
Allan, J. D., & Castillo, M. M. (2007) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-5583-6 · Cited by 940
Cited by
Gavrilescu, M., Demnerová, K., Aamand, J., Agathos, S., & Fava, F. (2015) · New Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.nbt.2014.01.001 · Cited by 1,266
Effects of neonicotinoids and fipronil on non-target invertebrates
Pisa, L. W., Amaral-Rogers, V., Belzunces, L. P., Bonmatin, J. M., Downs, C. A., Goulson, D., Kreutzweiser, D. P., Krupke, C., Liess, M., McField, M., et al. (2015) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-014-3471-x · Cited by 954
Self-citationPesticides reduce regional biodiversity of stream invertebrates
Beketov, M. A., Kefford, B. J., Schäfer, R. B., & Liess, M. (2013) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1305618110 · Cited by 874
Self-citationFungicides: An Overlooked Pesticide Class?
Zubrod, J. P., Bundschuh, M., Arts, G., Brühl, C. A., Imfeld, G., Knäbel, A., Payraudeau, S., Rasmussen, J. J., Rohr, J., Scharmüller, A., et al. (2019) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.8b04392 · Cited by 818
Self-citationAgricultural insecticides threaten surface waters at the global scale
Stehle, S., & Schulz, R. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1500232112 · Cited by 782
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Schäfer, R. B., von der Ohe, P. C., Rasmussen, J., Kefford, B. J., Beketov, M. A., Schulz, R., & Liess, M.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2012-04-10
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 5134-5142
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2138484395
- Cited by
- 277
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 13.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.