The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Occurrence and Potential Sources of Pyrethroid Insecticides in Stream Sediments from Seven U.S. Metropolitan Areas
Abstract
A nationally consistent approach was used to assess the occurrence and potential sources of pyrethroid insecticides in stream bed sediments from seven metropolitan areas across the United States. One or more pyrethroids were detected in almost half of the samples, with bifenthrin detected the most frequently (41%) and in each metropolitan area. Cyhalothrin, cypermethrin, permethrin, and resmethrin were detected much less frequently. Pyrethroid concentrations and Hyalella azteca mortality in 28-d tests were lower than in most urban stream studies. Log-transformed total pyrethroid toxic units (TUs) were significantly correlated with survival and bifenthrin was likely responsible for the majority of the observed toxicity. Sampling sites spanned a wide range of urbanization and log-transformed total pyrethroid concentrations were significantly correlated with urban land use. Dallas/Fort Worth had the highest pyrethroid detection frequency (89%), the greatest number of pyrethroids (4), and some of the highest concentrations. Salt Lake City had a similar percentage of detections but only bifenthrin was detected and at lower concentrations. The variation in pyrethroid concentrations among metropolitan areas suggests regional differences in pyrethroid use and transport processes. This study shows that pyrethroids commonly occur in urban stream sediments and may be contributing to sediment toxicity across the country.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Brander, S. M., Gabler, M. K., Fowler, N. L., Connon, R. E., & Schlenk, D. (2016) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.6b02253 · Cited by 258
Insight Into Microbial Applications for the Biodegradation of Pyrethroid Insecticides
Bhatt, P., Huang, Y., Zhan, H., & Chen, S. (2019) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2019.01778 · Cited by 202
Rasmussen, J. J., Wiberg-Larsen, P., Baattrup-Pedersen, A., Cedergreen, N., McKnight, U. S., Kreuger, J., Jacobsen, D., Kristensen, E. A., & Friberg, N. (2015) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2015.07.021 · Cited by 195
More Than a First Flush: Urban Creek Storm Hydrographs Demonstrate Broad Contaminant Pollutographs
Peter, K. T., Hou, F., Tian, Z., Wu, C., Goehring, M., Liu, F., & Kolodziej, E. P. (2020) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.0c00872 · Cited by 157
Chen, S., Dong, Y. H., Chang, C., Deng, Y., Zhang, X. F., Zhong, G., Song, H., Hu, M., & Zhang, L.-H. (2013) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2013.01.002 · Cited by 138
Metadata
- Authors
- Kuivila, K. M., Hladik, M. L., Ingersoll, C. G., Kemble, N. E., Moran, P. W., Calhoun, D. L., Nowell, L. H., & Gilliom, R. J.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2012-03-28
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 4297-4303
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2082085263
- Cited by
- 186
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Occurrence and Potential Sources of Pyrethroid Insecticides in Stream Sediments from Seven U.S. Metropolitan Areas. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/es2044882
- The paper
- Kuivila, K. M., Hladik, M. L., Ingersoll, C. G., Kemble, N. E., Moran, P. W., Calhoun, D. L., Nowell, L. H., & Gilliom, R. J. (2012). Occurrence and Potential Sources of Pyrethroid Insecticides in Stream Sediments from Seven U.S. Metropolitan Areas. Environmental Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1021/es2044882
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.