Cited by 137biodegradable polymer synthesis and propertiesEnvironmental Impact and SustainabilityAnaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production

Cradle-to-Gate Life Cycle Assessment for a Cradle-to-Cradle Cycle: Biogas-to-Bioplastic (and Back)

Rostkowski, Katherine H., Criddle, Craig S., Lepech, Michael D.·2012·Environmental Science & Technology

Abstract

At present, most synthetic organic materials are produced from fossil carbon feedstock that is regenerated over time scales of millions of years. Biobased alternatives can be rapidly renewed in cradle-to-cradle cycles (1-10 years). Such materials extend landfill life and decrease undesirable impacts due to material persistence. This work develops a LCA for synthesis of polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB) from methane with subsequent biodegradation of PHB back to biogas (40-70% methane, 30-60% carbon dioxide). The parameters for this cradle-to-cradle cycle for PHB production are developed and used as the basis for a cradle-to-gate LCA. PHB production from biogas methane is shown to be preferable to its production from cultivated feedstock due to the energy and land required for the feedstock cultivation and fermentation. For the PHB-methane cycle, the major challenges are PHB recovery and demands for energy. Some or all of the energy requirements can be satisfied using renewable energy, such as a portion of the collected biogas methane. Oxidation of 18-26% of the methane in a biogas stream can meet the energy demands for aeration and agitation, and recovery of PHB synthesized from the remaining 74-82%. Effective coupling of waste-to-energy technologies could thus conceivably enable PHB production without imported carbon and energy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/es204541w

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Closed-loop recycling of PHA can be realized by several biotic pathways.

    “While the closed-loop recycling of PHA can be realized by several biotic pathways 463,464 , the chemical recycling of PHAs to the constituent monomers can provide a time-efficient option.375”

    From Catalysis as an Enabling Science for Sustainable Polymers (2018) · cites this paper as [464]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rostkowski, K. H., Criddle, C. S., & Lepech, M. D.
Affiliations
Stanford University (US)
Corresponding author
Rostkowski, Katherine H.
Venue
Environmental Science & Technology
Published
2012-09-06
Volume
46
Issue
18
Pages
9822-9829
ISSN
  • 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5851
OpenAlex
W1973041860
Cited by
137
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Environmental Science & Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
Keywords
polyhydroxybutyrate, biogas, methane, bioplastic production, biodegradation, waste-to-energy, bioplastics, energy requirements, aeration energy, renewable energy, land use
MeSH terms
Biodegradation, Environmental, Hydroxybutyrates, Methane, Models, Molecular, Polymers, Biomass, Biofuels, Renewable Energy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review