The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Superhydrophilic Thin-Film Composite Forward Osmosis Membranes for Organic Fouling Control: Fouling Behavior and Antifouling Mechanisms
Abstract
This study investigates the fouling behavior and fouling resistance of superhydrophilic thin-film composite forward osmosis membranes functionalized with surface-tailored nanoparticles. Fouling experiments in both forward osmosis and reverse osmosis modes are performed with three model organic foulants: alginate, bovine serum albumin, and Suwannee river natural organic matter. A solution comprising monovalent and divalent salts is employed to simulate the solution chemistry of typical wastewater effluents. Reduced fouling is consistently observed for the superhydrophilic membranes compared to control thin-film composite polyamide membranes, in both reverse and forward osmosis modes. The fouling resistance and cleaning efficiency of the functionalized membranes is particularly outstanding in forward osmosis mode where the driving force for water flux is an osmotic pressure difference. To understand the mechanism of fouling, the intermolecular interactions between the foulants and the membrane surface are analyzed by direct force measurement using atomic force microscopy. Lower adhesion forces are observed for the superhydrophilic membranes compared to the control thin-film composite polyamide membranes. The magnitude and distribution of adhesion forces for the different membrane surfaces suggest that the antifouling properties of the superhydrophilic membranes originate from the barrier provided by the tightly bound hydration layer at their surface, as well as from the neutralization of the native carboxyl groups of thin-film composite polyamide membranes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Survey of Structure−Property Relationships of Surfaces that Resist the Adsorption of Protein
Ostuni, E., Chapman, R. G., Holmlin, R. E., Takayama, S., & Whitesides, G. M. (2001) · Langmuir · doi:10.1021/la010384m · Cited by 1,799
Cited by
Antifouling membranes for sustainable water purification: strategies and mechanisms
Zhang, R., Liu, Y., He, M., Su, Y., Zhao, X., Elimelech, M., & Jiang, Z. (2016) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c5cs00579e · Cited by 1,365
Self-citationPolymer-matrix nanocomposite membranes for water treatment
Yin, J., & Deng, B. (2015) · Journal of Membrane Science · doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2014.11.019 · Cited by 1,089
Zhang, J., Xu, Z., Shan, M., Zhou, B., Li, Y., Li, B., Niu, J., & Qian, X. (2013) · Journal of Membrane Science · doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2013.07.064 · Cited by 357
Wang, Z., & Lin, S. (2017) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2017.01.022 · Cited by 323
Liu, C., Lee, J., Ma, J., & Elimelech, M. (2017) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.6b05992 · Cited by 284
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Tiraferri, A., Kang, Y., Giannelis, E. P., & Elimelech, M.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2012-10-04
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 20
- Pages
- 11135-11144
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2000313082
- Cited by
- 304
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 14.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.