The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Degradation Kinetics and Metabolites of Carbamazepine in Soil
Abstract
The antiepileptic drug carbamazepine (CBZ) is one of the most frequently detected human pharmaceuticals in wastewater effluents and biosolids. Soil is a primary environmental compartment receiving CBZ through wastewater irrigation and biosolid application. In this study, we explored the transformation of CBZ to biologically active intermediates in soil. Both (14)C labeling and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) were used to track transformation kinetics and identify major degradation intermediates. Through 120 days of incubation under aerobic conditions, mineralization of CBZ did not exceed 2% of the spiked rate in different soils. Amendment of biosolids further suppressed mineralization. The fraction of non-extractable (i.e., bound) residue also remained negligible (<5%). On the other hand, CBZ was transformed to a range of degradation intermediates, including 10,11-dihydro-10-hydroxycarbamazepine, carbamazepine-10,11-epoxide, acridone-N-carbaldehyde, 4-aldehyde-9-acridone, and acridine, of which acridone-N-carbaldehyde was formed in a large fraction and appeared to be recalcitrant to further degradation. Electrocyclization, ring cleavage, hydrogen shift, carbonylation, and decarbonylation contributed to CBZ transformative reactions in soil, producing biologically active products. The persistence of the parent compound and formation of incomplete intermediates suggest that CBZ has a high risk for off-site transport from soil, such as accumulation into plants and contamination of groundwater.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Occurrence, sources, and fate of pharmaceuticals in aquatic environment and soil
Li, W. C. (2014) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2014.01.015 · Cited by 831
Gold, M., Tomberlin, J. K., Diener, S., Zurbrügg, C., & Mathys, A. (2018) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2018.10.022 · Cited by 528
Zong, Y., Shao, Y., Zeng, Y., Shao, B., Xu, L., Zhao, Z., Liu, W., & Wu, D. (2021) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c00375 · Cited by 499
Wu, X., Conkle, J. L., Ernst, F., & Gan, J. (2014) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es502868k · Cited by 293
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, J., Dodgen, L., Ye, Q., & Gan, J.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2013-04-02
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 3678-3684
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W1979991626
- Cited by
- 180
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Degradation Kinetics and Metabolites of Carbamazepine in Soil. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/es304944c
- The paper
- Li, J., Dodgen, L., Ye, Q., & Gan, J. (2013). Degradation Kinetics and Metabolites of Carbamazepine in Soil. Environmental Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1021/es304944c
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.