The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Enabling Graphene Oxide Nanosheets as Water Separation Membranes
Abstract
We report a novel procedure to synthesize a new type of water separation membrane using graphene oxide (GO) nanosheets such that water can flow through the nanochannels between GO layers while unwanted solutes are rejected by size exclusion and charge effects. The GO membrane was made via layer-by-layer deposition of GO nanosheets, which were cross-linked by 1,3,5-benzenetricarbonyl trichloride, on a polydopamine-coated polysulfone support. The cross-linking not only provided the stacked GO nanosheets with the necessary stability to overcome their inherent dispensability in water environment but also fine-tuned the charges, functionality, and spacing of the GO nanosheets. We then tested the membranes synthesized with different numbers of GO layers to demonstrate their interesting water separation performance. It was found that the GO membrane flux ranged between 80 and 276 LMH/MPa, roughly 4-10 times higher than that of most commercial nanofiltration membranes. Although the GO membrane in the present development stage had a relatively low rejection (6-46%) of monovalent and divalent salts, it exhibited a moderate rejection (46-66%) of Methylene blue and a high rejection (93-95%) of Rhodamine-WT. We conclude the paper by emphasizing that the facile synthesis of a GO membrane exploiting the ideal properties of inexpensive GO materials offers a myriad of opportunities to modify its physicochemical properties, potentially making the GO membrane a next-generation, cost-effective, and sustainable alternative to the long-existing thin-film composite polyamide membranes for water separation applications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The chemistry of graphene oxide
Dreyer, D. R., Park, S., Bielawski, C. W., & Ruoff, R. S. (2010) · Chem. Soc. Rev. · doi:10.1039/b917103g · Cited by 11,653
Cited by
Liu, Y., Ai, K., & Lu, L. (2014) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr400407a · Cited by 4,794
Smith, A. T., LaChance, A. M., Zeng, S., Liu, B., & Sun, L. (2019) · Nano Materials Science · doi:10.1016/j.nanoms.2019.02.004 · Cited by 1,643
Polymer-matrix nanocomposite membranes for water treatment
Yin, J., & Deng, B. (2015) · Journal of Membrane Science · doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2014.11.019 · Cited by 1,089
Zhang, P., Li, J., Lv, L., Zhao, Y., & Qu, L. (2017) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.7b01965 · Cited by 1,081
Environmental Applications of 2D Molybdenum Disulfide (MoS2) Nanosheets
Wang, Z., & Mi, B. (2017) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.7b01466 · Cited by 914
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Hu, M., & Mi, B.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2013-04-01
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 3715-3723
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2042136281
- Cited by
- 1,403
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 68.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.