Cited by 118Concrete and Cement Materials ResearchRecycled Aggregate Concrete PerformanceConcrete Corrosion and Durability

Calculating CO2 Uptake for Existing Concrete Structures during and after Service Life

Andersson, Ronny, Fridh, Katja, Stripple, Håkan, Häglund, Martin·2013·Environmental Science & Technology

Abstract

This paper presents a model that can calculate the uptake of CO2 in all existing concrete structures, including its uptake after service life. This is important for the calculation of the total CO2 uptake in the society and its time dependence. The model uses the well-documented cement use and knowledge of how the investments are distributed throughout the building sector to estimate the stock of concrete applications in a country. The depth of carbonation of these applications is estimated using two models, one theoretical and one based on field measurements. The maximum theoretical uptake potential is defined as the amount of CO2 that is emitted during calcination at the production of Portland cement, but the model can also, with some adjustments, be used for the other cement types. The model has been applied on data from Sweden and the results show a CO2 uptake in 2011 in all existing structures of about 300,000 tonnes, which corresponds to about 17% of the total emissions (calcination and fuel) from the production of new cement for use in Sweden in the same year. The study also shows that in the years 2030 and 2050, an increase in the uptake in crushed concrete, from 12,000 tonnes today to 200,000 and 500,000 tonnes of CO2, respectively, could be possible if the waste handling is redesigned.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/es401775w

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The rate and extent of recarbonation of cementitious products depends on many factors, ranging from concrete formulation and use over exposure conditions to recycling practices, rendering estimations of total recarbonation uncertain.

    “The rate and extent of recarbonation of various cementitious products depends on many factors, ranging from concrete formulation and use over exposure conditions to recycling practices. This renders estimations of total recarbonation fraught with uncertainty [11].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Andersson, R., Fridh, K., Stripple, H., & Häglund, M.
Affiliations
  • Lund University (SE)
  • IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute (SE)
  • Bryggaregatan 3, 241 30 Eslöv, Sweden
Corresponding author
Andersson, Ronny
Venue
Environmental Science & Technology
Published
2013-10-03
Volume
47
Issue
20
Pages
11625-11633
ISSN
  • 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5851
OpenAlex
W2075271180
Cited by
118
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3
FWCI
7.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Environmental Science & Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Concrete and Cement Materials Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Concrete Corrosion and Durability
Keywords
CO2 uptake, concrete structures, carbonation, carbon sequestration, crushed concrete, building sector, service life, Sweden
MeSH terms
Carbon Dioxide, Construction Materials, Models, Theoretical, Surface Properties, Sweden, Uncertainty

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review