Calculating CO2 Uptake for Existing Concrete Structures during and after Service Life
Abstract
This paper presents a model that can calculate the uptake of CO2 in all existing concrete structures, including its uptake after service life. This is important for the calculation of the total CO2 uptake in the society and its time dependence. The model uses the well-documented cement use and knowledge of how the investments are distributed throughout the building sector to estimate the stock of concrete applications in a country. The depth of carbonation of these applications is estimated using two models, one theoretical and one based on field measurements. The maximum theoretical uptake potential is defined as the amount of CO2 that is emitted during calcination at the production of Portland cement, but the model can also, with some adjustments, be used for the other cement types. The model has been applied on data from Sweden and the results show a CO2 uptake in 2011 in all existing structures of about 300,000 tonnes, which corresponds to about 17% of the total emissions (calcination and fuel) from the production of new cement for use in Sweden in the same year. The study also shows that in the years 2030 and 2050, an increase in the uptake in crushed concrete, from 12,000 tonnes today to 200,000 and 500,000 tonnes of CO2, respectively, could be possible if the waste handling is redesigned.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The rate and extent of recarbonation of cementitious products depends on many factors, ranging from concrete formulation and use over exposure conditions to recycling practices, rendering estimations of total recarbonation uncertain.
“The rate and extent of recarbonation of various cementitious products depends on many factors, ranging from concrete formulation and use over exposure conditions to recycling practices. This renders estimations of total recarbonation fraught with uncertainty [11].”
From Isotope chemistry to trace carbon mineralization in construction materials (2026) · cites this paper as [11]
Cites
A large and persistent carbon sink in the world’s forests
Pan, Y., Birdsey, R. A., Fang, J., Houghton, R., Kauppi, P. E., Kurz, W. A., Phillips, O. L., Shvidenko, A., Lewis, S. L., Canadell, J. G., et al. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1201609 · Cited by 8,458 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Substantial global carbon uptake by cement carbonation
Xi, F., Davis, S. J., Ciais, P., Crawford-Brown, D., Guan, D., Pade, C., Shi, T., Syddall, M., Lv, J., Ji, L., et al. (2016) · Nature Geoscience · doi:10.1038/ngeo2840 · Cited by 689 · see citing works
Carbon dioxide sequestration of concrete slurry waste and its valorisation in construction products
Xuan, D., Zhan, B., Poon, C. S., & Zheng, W. (2016) · Construction and Building Materials · doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.03.109 · Cited by 178 · see citing works
Saeki, N., Kurihara, R., Ohkubo, T., Teramoto, A., Suda, Y., Kitagaki, R., & Maruyama, I. (2025) · Cement and Concrete Research · doi:10.1016/j.cemconres.2024.107777 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Carbon dioxide uptake by pure Portland and blended cement pastes
Andrade, C., & Sanjuán, M. Á. (2021) · Developments in the Built Environment · doi:10.1016/j.dibe.2021.100063 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Isotope chemistry to trace carbon mineralization in construction materials
Jansen, D., Matschei, T., Van Geldern, R., Barth, J., & Snellings, R. (2026) · RILEM Technical Letters · doi:10.21809/rilemtechlett.2026.232
- Authors
- Andersson, R., Fridh, K., Stripple, H., & Häglund, M.
- Affiliations
- Lund University (SE)
- IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute (SE)
- Bryggaregatan 3, 241 30 Eslöv, Sweden
- Corresponding author
- Andersson, Ronny
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2013-10-03
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 20
- Pages
- 11625-11633
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2075271180
- Cited by
- 118
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3
- FWCI
- 7.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Environmental Science & Technology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Concrete and Cement Materials Research
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Concrete Corrosion and Durability
- Keywords
- CO2 uptake, concrete structures, carbonation, carbon sequestration, crushed concrete, building sector, service life, Sweden
- MeSH terms
- Carbon Dioxide, Construction Materials, Models, Theoretical, Surface Properties, Sweden, Uncertainty
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review