The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Changing Paradigm of Air Pollution Monitoring
Abstract
The air pollution monitoring paradigm is rapidly changing due to recent advances in (1) the development of portable, lower-cost air pollution sensors reporting data in near-real time at a high-time resolution, (2) increased computational and visualization capabilities, and (3) wireless communication/infrastructure. It is possible that these advances can support traditional air quality monitoring by supplementing ambient air monitoring and enhancing compliance monitoring. Sensors are beginning to provide individuals and communities the tools needed to understand their environmental exposures with these data individual and community-based strategies can be developed to reduce pollution exposure as well as understand linkages to health indicators. Each of these areas as well as corresponding challenges (e.g., quality of data) and potential opportunities associated with development and implementation of air pollution sensors are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Recent advances in floating TiO2-based photocatalysts for environmental application
Xing, Z., Zhang, J., Cui, J., Yin, J., Zhao, T., Kuang, J., Xiu, Z., Wan, N., & Zhou, W. (2018) · Applied Catalysis B: Environmental · doi:10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.12.005 · Cited by 550
West, J. J., Cohen, A., Dentener, F., Brunekreef, B., Zhu, T., Armstrong, B., Bell, M. L., Brauer, M., Carmichael, G., Costa, D. L., et al. (2016) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.5b03827 · Cited by 390
Personal exposure monitoring of PM 2.5 in indoor and outdoor microenvironments
Steinle, S., Reis, S., Sabel, C. E., Semple, S., Twigg, M. M., Braban, C. F., Leeson, S. R., Heal, M. R., Harrison, D., Lin, C., et al. (2015) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.12.003 · Cited by 337
Titanate and titania nanostructured materials for environmental and energy applications: a review
Zhang, Y., Jiang, Z., Huang, J., Lim, L. Y., Li, W., Deng, J., Gong, D., Tang, Y., Lai, Y., & Chen, Z. (2015) · RSC Advances · doi:10.1039/c5ra11298b · Cited by 318
Smart Earth: A meta-review and implications for environmental governance
Bakker, K., & Ritts, M. (2018) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.07.011 · Cited by 244
Kramer, A. L., Liu, J., Li, L., Connolly, R., Barbato, M., & Zhu, Y. (2023) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.159218 · Cited by 65
Assessment of air quality sensor system performance after relocation
Zauli-Sajani, S., Marchesi, S., Pironi, C., Barbieri, C., Poluzzi, V., & Colacci, A. (2021) · Atmospheric Pollution Research · doi:10.1016/j.apr.2020.11.010 · Cited by 30
Feenstra, B., Collier-Oxandale, A., Papapostolou, V., Cocker, D., & Polidori, A. (2020) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2020.104832 · Cited by 22
Metadata
- Authors
- Snyder, E. G., Watkins, T. H., Solomon, P. A., Thoma, E. D., Williams, R. W., Hagler, G. S. W., Shelow, D., Hindin, D. A., Kilaru, V. J., & Preuss, P. W.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2013-10-03
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 20
- Pages
- 11369-11377
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2079098817
- Cited by
- 974
- References
- 0
- Type
- other
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
