The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Formation of Brominated Disinfection Byproducts during Chloramination of Drinking Water: New Polar Species and Overall Kinetics
Abstract
The formation of brominated disinfection byproducts (Br-DBPs), which are generally significantly more cytotoxic and genotoxic than their chlorinated analogues, in chloramination has not been fully examined. In this work, the formation of new polar Br-DBPs in simulated drinking waters was examined using state-of-the-art ultraperformance liquid chromatography/electrospray ionization-triple quadrupole mass spectrometry. As many as 29 aliphatic, aromatic, or nitrogenous polar Br-DBPs were detected in chloramination, and five of them (including 2,4,6-tribromoresorcinol, 2,6-dibromo-4-nitrophenol, 2,2,4-tribromo-5-hydroxy-4-cyclopentene-1,3-dione, 2,2,4-dibromochloro-5-hydroxy-4-cyclopentene-1,3-dione, and 2,2,4-bromodichloro-5-hydroxy-4-cyclopentene-1,3-dione) were tentatively identified. Unlike chlorination, chloramination favored the formation of aromatic and nitrogenous polar Br-DBPs and was mild enough to allow polar intermediate Br-DBPs to accumulate. To further explore the formation mechanism of Br-DBPs in chloramination, a quantitative empirical model involving 33 major reactions was developed to describe the overall kinetics. According to the modeling results, bromochloramine and monobromamine were the major species responsible for 54.2-58.1% and 41.7-45.7%, respectively, of the formed Br-DBPs, while hypobromous acid accounted for only 0.2% of the formed Br-DBPs; direct reactions between monochloramine and natural organic matter accounted for the majority of the formed chlorinated DBPs (93.7-95.1%); hypochlorous acid and hypobromous acid in the chloramination were at ng/L or subng/L levels, which were not enough to cause polar intermediate Br-DBPs to decompose.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
RICHARDSON, S., PLEWA, M., WAGNER, E., SCHOENY, R., & DEMARINI, D. (2007) · Mutation Research/Reviews in Mutation Research · doi:10.1016/j.mrrev.2007.09.001 · Cited by 3,317
Occurrence of a new generation of disinfection byproducts†
Krasner, S. W., Weinberg, H. S., Richardson, S. D., Pastor, S. J., Chinn, R., Sclimenti, M. J., Onstad, G. D., & Thruston, A. D. (2006) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es060353j · Cited by 1,633
Occurrence and Mammalian Cell Toxicity of Iodinated Disinfection Byproducts in Drinking Water
Richardson, S. D., Fasano, F., Ellington, J. J., Crumley, F. G., Buettner, K. M., Evans, J. J., Blount, B. C., Silva, L. K., Waite, T. J., Luther, G. W., et al. (2008) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es801169k · Cited by 655
Cited by
Disinfection by-products in drinking water: Occurrence, toxicity and abatement
Srivastav, A. L., Patel, N., & Chaudhary, V. K. (2020) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115474 · Cited by 342
Jiang, J., Han, J., & Zhang, X. (2020) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.9b06403 · Cited by 284
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhai, H., Zhang, X., Zhu, X., Liu, J., & Ji, M.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2014-02-19
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 2579-2588
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2314902518
- Cited by
- 275
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 13.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Formation of Brominated Disinfection Byproducts during Chloramination of Drinking Water: New Polar Species and Overall Kinetics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/es4034765
- The paper
- Zhai, H., Zhang, X., Zhu, X., Liu, J., & Ji, M. (2014). Formation of Brominated Disinfection Byproducts during Chloramination of Drinking Water: New Polar Species and Overall Kinetics. Environmental Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1021/es4034765
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.