The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reducing the Discharge of Micropollutants in the Aquatic Environment: The Benefits of Upgrading Wastewater Treatment Plants
Abstract
Micropollutants (MPs) as individual compounds or in complex mixtures are relevant for water quality and may trigger unwanted ecological effects. MPs originate from different point and diffuse sources and enter water bodies via different flow paths. Effluents from conventional wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs), in which various MPs are not or not completely removed, is one major source. To improve the water quality and avoid potential negative ecological effects by micropollutants, various measures to reduce the discharge should be taken. In this feature we discuss one of these measures; the benefits of upgrading WWTPs toward reduced MP loads and toxicities from wastewater effluents, using the recently decided Swiss strategy as an example. Based on (i) full-scale case studies using ozonation or powder activated carbon treatment, showing substantial reduction of MP discharges and concomitant reduced toxicities, (ii) social and political acceptance, (iii) technical feasibility and sufficient cost-effectiveness, the Swiss authorities recently decided to implement additional wastewater treatment steps as mitigation strategy to improve water quality. Since MPs are of growing global concern, the concepts and considerations behind the Swiss strategy are explained in this feature, which could be of use for other countries as well. It should be realized that upgrading WWTPs is not the only solution to reduce the discharge of MPs entering the environment, but is part of a broader, multipronged mitigation strategy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Pharmaceuticals as emerging contaminants and their removal from water. A review
Rivera-Utrilla, J., Sánchez-Polo, M., Ferro-García, M. Á., Prados-Joya, G., & Ocampo-Pérez, R. (2013) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.07.059 · Cited by 1,486
Effects of the Antimicrobial Sulfamethoxazole on Groundwater Bacterial Enrichment
Underwood, J. C., Harvey, R. W., Metge, D. W., Repert, D. A., Baumgartner, L. K., Smith, R. L., Roane, T. M., & Barber, L. B. (2011) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es103605e · Cited by 217
Cited by
A Review of the Fate of Micropollutants in Wastewater Treatment Plants
Margot, J., Rossi, L., Barry, D. A., & Holliger, C. (2015) · WIREs Water · doi:10.1002/wat2.1090 · Cited by 458
Capodaglio, A., & Olsson, G. (2019) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12010266 · Cited by 328
Progress and challenges of contaminate removal from wastewater using microalgae biomass
Ahmed, S. F., Mofijur, M., Parisa, T. A., Islam, N., Kusumo, F., Inayat, A., Le, V. G., Badruddin, I. A., Khan, T. M. Y., & Ong, H. C. (2022) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.131656 · Cited by 325
Rizzo, L., Gernjak, W., Krzeminski, P., Malato, S., McArdell, C. S., Perez, J. A. S., Schaar, H., & Fatta-Kassinos, D. (2020) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.136312 · Cited by 308
Gago-Ferrero, P., Bletsou, A. A., Damalas, D. E., Aalizadeh, R., Alygizakis, N. A., Singer, H. P., Hollender, J., & Thomaidis, N. S. (2020) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.121712 · Cited by 254
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Eggen, R. I. L., Hollender, J., Joss, A., Schärer, M., & Stamm, C.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2014-06-19
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 7683-7689
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2053967526
- Cited by
- 596
- References
- 2
- Type
- other
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.