CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 147

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Effect of Different Solutes, Natural Organic Matter, and Particulate Fe(III) on Ferrate(VI) Decomposition in Aqueous Solutions

Jiang, Yanjun, Goodwill, Joseph E., Tobiason, John E., Reckhow, David A.·2015·Environmental Science & Technology
DOI 10.1021/es505516w
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This study investigated the impacts of buffer ions, natural organic matter (NOM), and particulate Fe(III) on ferrate(VI) decomposition and characterized Fe(VI) decomposition kinetics and exposure in various waters. Homogeneous and heterogeneous Fe(VI) decomposition can be described as a second- and first-order reaction with respect to Fe(VI), respectively. Fe(VI) decay was catalyzed by Fe(VI) decomposition products. Solutes capable of forming complexes with iron hydroxides retarded Fe(VI) decay. Fractionation of the resulting solutions from Fe(VI) self-decay and ferric chloride addition in borate- and phosphate-buffered waters showed that phosphate could sequester Fe(III). The nature of the iron precipitate from Fe(VI) decomposition was different from that of freshly precipitated ferric hydroxide from ferric chloride solutions. The stabilizing effects of different solutes on Fe(VI) are in the following order: phosphate > bicarbonate > borate. The constituents of colored and alkaline waters (NOM and bicarbonate) inhibited the catalytic effects of Fe(VI) decomposition products and stabilized Fe(VI) in natural waters. Because of the stabilizing effects of solutes, moderate doses of Fe(VI) added to natural waters at pH 7.5 resulted in exposures that have been shown to be effective for inactivation of target pathogens. Preformed ferric hydroxide was less effective than freshly dosed ferric chloride in accelerating Fe(VI) decomposition.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/es505516w

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 37

  1. Sharma V. K., 2010, Environ. Sci. Technol., 44, 5148, 10.1021/es1005187 · DOI
  2. Sharma V. K., 2002, Adv. Environ. Res. (Oxford, U.K.), 6, 143, 10.1016/S1093-0191(01)00119-8 · DOI
  3. Wood R. H., 1958, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 80, 2038, 10.1021/ja01542a002 · DOI
  4. Jiang J. Q., 2003, Environ. Eng. Sci., 20, 627, 10.1089/109287503770736140 · DOI
  5. Jiang J. Q., 2002, Water Res., 36, 1397, 10.1016/S0043-1354(01)00358-X · DOI · Paper page
  6. Rush J. D., 1996, Free Radical Res., 24, 187, 10.3109/10715769609088016 · DOI
  7. Sharma V. K., 2001, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 3, 2059, 10.1039/b101432n · DOI
  8. Licht S., 2001, J. Power Sources, 101, 167, 10.1016/S0378-7753(01)00786-8 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Lee Y., 2014, Environ. Sci. Technol., 48, 5154, 10.1021/es500804g · DOI
  10. Li C., 2005, Chemosphere, 61, 537, 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.02.027 · DOI
  11. Kamachi T., 2005, J. Org. Chem., 70, 4380, 10.1021/jo050091o · DOI
  12. Sharma V. K., 1997, Environ. Sci. Technol., 31, 2486, 10.1021/es960755z · DOI
  13. Sharma V. K., 1998, Environ. Sci. Technol., 32, 2608, 10.1021/es970820k · DOI
  14. Shiota Y., 2003, J. Org. Chem., 68, 3958, 10.1021/jo0207168 · DOI
  15. Lee Y., 2010, Water Res., 44, 555, 10.1016/j.watres.2009.11.045 · DOI
  16. Carr, J. D.; Kelter, P. B.; Tabatabai, A.; Splichal, D.; Erickson, J.; McLaughlin, C. W.Properties of ferrate(VI) in aqueous solution: An alternative oxidant in wastewater treatment. InProceedings of the Fifth Conference on Water Chlorination: Environmental Impact and Health Effects, Williamsburg, VA, June 3–8, 1984;Lewis:Chelsea, MI, 1985; Vol.5, pp1285–1298
  17. Sarma R., 2012, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 134, 15371, 10.1021/ja304786s · DOI
  18. Persson P., 1996, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 177, 263, 10.1006/jcis.1996.0030 · DOI
  19. Anquandah G. A. K., 2011, Environ. Sci. Technol., 45, 10575, 10.1021/es202237g · DOI
  20. Anquandah G. A. K., 2013, Chemosphere, 91, 105, 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.12.001 · DOI
  21. Carr J. D., 2006, Abstr. Pap. Am. Chem. Soc., 232, 495
  22. Casbeer E. M., 2013, Environ. Sci. Technol., 47, 4572, 10.1021/es305283k · DOI
  23. Johnson M. D., 1992, Inorg. Chem., 31, 5140, 10.1021/ic00050a040 · DOI
  24. Johnson M. D., 2003, Inorg. Chem., 42, 6923, 10.1021/ic020705x · DOI
  25. Sharma V. K., 2013, Coord. Chem. Rev., 257, 495, 10.1016/j.ccr.2012.04.014 · DOI
  26. Yang B., 2012, Water Res., 46, 2194, 10.1016/j.watres.2012.01.047 · DOI
  27. Zimmermann S. G., 2012, Environ. Sci. Technol., 46, 876, 10.1021/es203348q · DOI
  28. Schreyer J. M., 1951, Anal. Chem., 23, 1312, 10.1021/ac60057a028 · DOI
  29. Wagner W. F., 1952, Anal. Chem., 24, 1497, 10.1021/ac60069a037 · DOI
  30. Schink T., 1980, Water Res., 14, 1705, 10.1016/0043-1354(80)90106-2 · DOI
  31. Davis C. C., 2001, Environ. Sci. Technol., 35, 3158, 10.1021/es0018421 · DOI
  32. Lee Y., 2005, Water Res., 39, 1946, 10.1016/j.watres.2005.03.005 · DOI
  33. Rahnemaie R., 2007, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 315, 415, 10.1016/j.jcis.2007.07.017 · DOI
  34. Goldberg S., 1985, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 49, 1374, 10.2136/sssaj1985.03615995004900060009x · DOI
  35. Su C., 2001, Environ. Sci. Technol., 35, 4562, 10.1021/es010768z · DOI
  36. Hu L., 2012, Environ. Sci. Technol., 46, 12079, 10.1021/es3031962 · DOI
  37. Prucek R., 2013, Environ. Sci. Technol., 47, 3283, 10.1021/es3042719 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 147

Metadata

Authors
Jiang, Y., Goodwill, J. E., Tobiason, J. E., & Reckhow, D. A.
Venue
Environmental Science & Technology
Publisher
American Chemical Society (ACS)
Published
2015-02-10
Volume
49
Issue
5
Pages
2841-2848
ISSN
  • 0013-936X
  • 1520-5851
DOI
10.1021/es505516w
Cited by
147
References
0
Language
en
Funders
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (83560201)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review