The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cellulose Nanomaterials in Water Treatment Technologies
Open accessAbstract
Cellulose nanomaterials are naturally occurring with unique structural, mechanical and optical properties. While the paper and packaging, automotive, personal care, construction, and textiles industries have recognized cellulose nanomaterials' potential, we suggest cellulose nanomaterials have great untapped potential in water treatment technologies. In this review, we gather evidence of cellulose nanomaterials' beneficial role in environmental remediation and membranes for water filtration, including their high surface area-to-volume ratio, low environmental impact, high strength, functionalizability, and sustainability. We make direct comparison between cellulose nanomaterials and carbon nanotubes (CNTs) in terms of physical and chemical properties, production costs, use and disposal in order to show the potential of cellulose nanomaterials as a sustainable replacement for CNTs in water treatment technologies. Finally, we comment on the need for improved communication and collaboration across the myriad industries invested in cellulose nanomaterials production and development to achieve an efficient means to commercialization.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cellulose nanomaterials review: structure, properties and nanocomposites
Moon, R. J., Martini, A., Nairn, J., Simonsen, J., & Youngblood, J. (2011) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c0cs00108b · Cited by 6,756
Biochar as a sorbent for contaminant management in soil and water: A review
Ahmad, M., Rajapaksha, A. U., Lim, J. E., Zhang, M., Bolan, N., Mohan, D., Vithanage, M., Lee, S. S., & Ok, Y. S. (2014) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.10.071 · Cited by 4,662
Cellulosic nanocomposites: a review
(2008) · BioResources · doi:10.15376/biores.3.3.929-980 · Cited by 901
Single-Component and Binary CO2 and H2O Adsorption of Amine-Functionalized Cellulose
Gebald, C., Wurzbacher, J. A., Borgschulte, A., Zimmermann, T., & Steinfeld, A. (2014) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es404430g · Cited by 226
Sun, D., Yang, J., & Wang, X. (2010) · Nanoscale · doi:10.1039/b9nr00158a · Cited by 163
Cited by
Wood-based nanotechnologies toward sustainability
Jiang, F., Li, T., Li, Y., Zhang, Y., Gong, A., Dai, J., Hitz, E., Luo, W., & Hu, L. (2018) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201703453 · Cited by 599
Nourani, M., Baghdadi, M., Javan, M., & Bidhendi, G. N. (2016) · Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jece.2016.03.028 · Cited by 82
Advances in the Applications of Nanomaterials for Wastewater Treatment
Epelle, E. I., Okoye, P. U., Roddy, S., Gunes, B., & Okolie, J. A. (2022) · Environments · doi:10.3390/environments9110141 · Cited by 82
Mosivand, S., Kazeminezhad, I., & Fathabad, S. P. (2019) · Microchemical Journal · doi:10.1016/j.microc.2019.01.052 · Cited by 18
Nanomaterials in wastewater treatments
Barik, B., Nayak, P. S., & Dash, P. (2020) · Nanotechnology in the Beverage Industry · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819941-1.00007-9 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Carpenter, A. W., de Lannoy, C.-F., & Wiesner, M. R.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2015-04-15
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 5277-5287
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2048887983
- Cited by
- 674
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 19.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
