The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Formation of Pesticide Nonextractable (Bound) Residues in Soil: Magnitude, Controlling Factors and Reversibility
Abstract
The analysis of the coherent data on nonextractable (bound) residues (NER) from the literature and EU pesticide registration dossiers allows the identification of general trends, in spite of the large variability and heterogeneity of data. About 50% of the pesticides reviewed exhibit a low proportion of NER (less than 30% of the initial amount) while only 12% of pesticides have a proportion of NER exceeding 70%. The lowest proportion of NER was found for dinitroanilines (<20%), and the largest value was obtained for carbamates, and in particular dithiocarbamates. The presence of chemical reactive groups, such as aniline or phenol, tends to yield a larger proportion of NER. NER originating from N-heteroatomic ring were found to be lower than those from phenyl-ring structures. Among the environmental factors affecting the formation of NER, microbial activity has a direct and significant effect. Concerning the NER uptake or their bioavailability, consistent data suggest that only a small percentage of the total amounts of NER can be released. The analysis of NER formation kinetics showed that incubation experiments are often stopped too early to allow a correct evaluation of the NER maturation phase. Therefore, there is a need for longer term experiments to evaluate the tail of the NER formation kinetics. Still, the heterogeneity of the NER data between pesticides and for specific pesticides calls for great care in the interpretation of the data and their generalization.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
SOM genesis: microbial biomass as a significant source
Miltner, A., Bombach, P., Schmidt-Brücken, B., & Kästner, M. (2012) · Biogeochemistry · doi:10.1007/s10533-011-9658-z · Cited by 1,123
Fate of Bisphenol A in Terrestrial and Aquatic Environments
Im, J., & Löffler, F. E. (2016) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.6b00877 · Cited by 305
Pesticides, Environmental Pollution, and Health
Özkara, A., Akyil, D., & Konuk, M. (2016) · Environmental Health Risk - Hazardous Factors to Living Species · doi:10.5772/63094 · Cited by 284
Mamy, L., Patureau, D., Barriuso, E., Bedos, C., Bessac, F., Louchart, X., Martin-laurent, F., Miege, C., & Benoit, P. (2015) · Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/10643389.2014.955627 · Cited by 177
Self-citationZhu, X., Song, X., & Schwarzbauer, J. (2021) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143230 · Cited by 28
Metadata
- Authors
- Barriuso, E., Benoit, P., & Dubus, I. G.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2008-02-07
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1845-1854
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2054144089
- Cited by
- 291
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Formation of Pesticide Nonextractable (Bound) Residues in Soil: Magnitude, Controlling Factors and Reversibility. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/es7021736
- The paper
- Barriuso, E., Benoit, P., & Dubus, I. G. (2008). Formation of Pesticide Nonextractable (Bound) Residues in Soil: Magnitude, Controlling Factors and Reversibility. Environmental Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1021/es7021736
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.