Cited by 1,123Soil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsMicrobial Community Ecology and PhysiologyMycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions

SOM genesis: microbial biomass as a significant source

Open access
Miltner, Anja, Bombach, Petra, Schmidt-Brücken, Burkhard, Kästner, Matthias·2012·Biogeochemistry

Abstract

Proper management of soil organic matter (SOM) is needed for maintaining soil fertility and for mitigation of the global increase in atmospheric CO₂ concentrations and should be informed by knowledge about the sources, spatial organisation and stabilisation processes of SOM. Recently, microbial biomass residues (i.e. necromass) have been identified as a significant source of SOM. Here, we propose that cell wall envelopes of bacteria and fungi are stabilised in soil and contribute significantly to small-particulate SOM formation. This hypothesis is based on the mass balance of a soil incubation experiment with ¹³C-labelled bacterial cells and on the visualisation of the microbial residues by means of scanning electron microscopy (SEM). At the end of a 224-day incubation, 50% of the biomass-derived C remained in the soil, mainly in the non-living part of SOM (40% of the added biomass C). SEM micrographs only rarely showed intact cells. Instead, organic patchy fragments of 200–500 nm size were abundant and these fragments were associated with all stages of cell envelope decay and fragmentation. Similar fragments, developed on initially clean and sterile in situ microcosms during exposure to groundwater, provide clear evidence for their formation during microbial growth and surface colonisation. Microbial cell envelope fragments thus contribute significantly to SOM formation. This origin and the related macromolecular architecture of SOM are consistent with most observations on SOM, including the abundance of microbial-derived biomarkers, the low C/N ratio, the water repellency and the stabilisation of biomolecules, which in theory should be easily degradable.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10533-011-9658-z

Cites

74 of 74 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Miltner, A., Bombach, P., Schmidt-Brücken, B., & Kästner, M.
Affiliations
  • Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (DE)
  • Technische Universität Dresden (DE)
Corresponding author
Miltner, Anja
Venue
Biogeochemistry
Published
2011-10-12
Volume
111
Issue
1-3
Pages
41-55
ISSN
  • 0168-2563 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-515X
OpenAlex
W2080666601
Cited by
1,123
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 75 · 2025: 92 · 2024: 114 · 2023: 113 · 2022: 124 · 2021: 119 · 2020: 97 · 2019: 63 · 2018: 85 · 2017: 45 · 2016: 61 · 2015: 52 · 2014: 51 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 8
FWCI
41.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biogeochemistry (publishedVersion)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Helmholtz-Zentrum für Umweltforschung
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
Keywords
soil organic matter, microbial necromass, microbial biomass, cell wall fragments, bacterial cell envelope, fungal cell wall, soil incubation, C/N ratio, water repellency, soil microcosms, groundwater exposure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review