The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Formation of N-Nitrosamines from Eleven Disinfection Treatments of Seven Different Surface Waters
Abstract
Formation of nine N-nitrosamines has been investigated when seven different source waters representing various qualities were each treated with eleven bench-scale disinfection processes, without addition of nitrosamine precursors. These disinfection treatments included chlorine (OCl-), chloramine (NH2Cl), chlorine dioxide (ClO2), ozone (O3), ultraviolet (UV), advanced oxidation processes (AOP), and combinations. The total organic carbon (TOC) of the seven source waters ranged from 2 to 24 mg x L(-1). The disinfected water samples and the untreated source waters were analyzed for nine nitrosamines using a solid phase extraction and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method. Prior to any treatment, N-nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA) was detected ranging from 0 to 53 ng x L(-1) in six of the seven source waters, and its concentrations increased in the disinfected water samples (0-118 ng x L(-1)). N-nitrosodiethylamine (NDEA), N-nitrosomorpholine (NMor), and N-nitrosodiphenylamine (NDPhA) were also identified in some of the disinfected water samples. NDPhA (0.2-0.6 ng x L(-1)) was formed after disinfection with OCl-, NH2Cl, O3, and MPUV/OCl-. NMEA was produced with OCl- and MPUV/OCl-, and NMor formation was associated with O3. In addition, UVtreatment alone degraded NDMA; however, UV/ OCl- and AOP/OCl- treatments produced higher amounts of NDMA compared to UV and AOP alone, respectively. These results suggest that UV degradation or AOP oxidation treatment may provide a source of NDMA precursors. This study demonstrates that environmental concentrations and mixtures of unknown nitrosamine precursors in source waters can form NDMA and other nitrosamines.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Occurrence of a new generation of disinfection byproducts†
Krasner, S. W., Weinberg, H. S., Richardson, S. D., Pastor, S. J., Chinn, R., Sclimenti, M. J., Onstad, G. D., & Thruston, A. D. (2006) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es060353j · Cited by 1,633
Cited by
Li, X.-F., & Mitch, W. A. (2018) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.7b05440 · Cited by 1,020
Self-citationHollender, J., Zimmermann, S. G., Koepke, S., Krauss, M., McArdell, C. S., Ort, C., Singer, H., von Gunten, U., & Siegrist, H. (2009) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es9014629 · Cited by 870
Shah, A. D., & Mitch, W. A. (2012) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es203312s · Cited by 767
Removal of natural organic matter from drinking water by advanced oxidation processes
Matilainen, A., & Sillanpää, M. (2010) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.04.067 · Cited by 706
High-silica zeolites for adsorption of organic micro-pollutants in water treatment: A review
Jiang, N., Shang, R., Heijman, S. G. J., & Rietveld, L. C. (2018) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2018.07.017 · Cited by 521
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhao, Y.-Y., Boyd, J. M., Woodbeck, M., Andrews, R. C., Qin, F., Hrudey, S. E., & Li, X.-F.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2008-05-29
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 4857-4862
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W1987447028
- Cited by
- 191
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.