The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Source Apportionment of in Vitro Reactive Oxygen Species Bioassay Activity from Atmospheric Particulate Matter
Abstract
Recent atmospheric particulate matter health studies have suggested that the redox activity is an important factor in particulate matter toxicology, and that reactive oxygen species (ROS) activity may be an important characteristic of particulate matter that is associated with adverse health effects. In this study, associations between atmospheric particulate matter sources and in vitro ROS activities are investigated. Ambient concentrations of fine particle water-soluble elements and total organic and elemental carbon were measured daily in Denver for the 2003 calendar year. The data were used in a multivariate factor analysis source apportionment model, positive matrix factorization (PMF), to determine the contributions of nine sources or factors: a mobile source factor, a water soluble carbon factor, a sulfate factor, a soil dust source, an iron source, two point sources characterized by water soluble toxic metals, a pyrotechnique factor, and a platinum group metal factor. Aqueous leachates, including water soluble and colloidal components, as well as insoluble particles that pass through a 0.2 microm pore size filter, of 45 randomly selected PM samples, were assayed to quantify ROS activity using an in vitro rat alveolar macrophage assay. Results show that PM-stimulated in vitro ROS production was significantly positively correlated with the contributions from three sources: the iron source, the soil dust source and the water soluble carbon factor. The iron source accounted for the greatest fraction of the measured variability in redox activity, followed by the soil dust and the water-soluble carbon factor. Seventy-seven percent of the in vitro ROS activity was explained by a linear combination of these three source contributions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Pope, C. A., Burnett, R. T., Thurston, G. D., Thun, M. J., Calle, E. E., Krewski, D., & Godleski, J. J. (2004) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.0000108927.80044.7f · Cited by 2,592
Fox, J. (1991) · doi:10.4135/9781412985604 · Cited by 1,008
Review: Oxidative Stress and Disease
SPECTOR, A. (2000) · Journal of Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics · doi:10.1089/jop.2000.16.193 · Cited by 244
Cited by
Fang, T., Verma, V., Bates, J. T., Abrams, J., Klein, M., Strickland, M. J., Sarnat, S. E., Chang, H. H., Mulholland, J. A., Tolbert, P. E., et al. (2016) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-16-3865-2016 · Cited by 373
Generation of Reactive Oxygen Species Mediated by Humic-like Substances in Atmospheric Aerosols
Lin, P., & Yu, J. Z. (2011) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es2028229 · Cited by 273
Air Pollution, Oxidative Stress, and Alzheimer's Disease
Moulton, P. V., & Yang, W. (2012) · Journal of Environmental and Public Health · doi:10.1155/2012/472751 · Cited by 265
Air pollution and circulating biomarkers of oxidative stress
Delfino, R. J., Staimer, N., & Vaziri, N. D. (2011) · Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health · doi:10.1007/s11869-010-0095-2 · Cited by 181
Shafer, M. M., Perkins, D. A., Antkiewicz, D. S., Stone, E. A., Quraishi, T. A., & Schauer, J. J. (2010) · J. Environ. Monit. · doi:10.1039/b915008k · Cited by 131
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, Y., Schauer, J. J., Shafer, M. M., Hannigan, M. P., & Dutton, S. J.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2008-09-04
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 7502-7509
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W1969330570
- Cited by
- 174
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 7.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.