The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Derivation of an Aquatic Predicted No-Effect Concentration for the Synthetic Hormone, 17α-Ethinyl Estradiol
Open accessAbstract
17alpha-Ethinyl estradiol (EE2) is a synthetic estrogen widely used in combination with other steroid hormones in oral contraceptives and in the contraceptive patch. EE2 has been detected in sewage treatment plant effluents in the low nanogram -per-liter range and occasionally in surface waters in the U.S., U.K., Canada, Brazil, Germany, and elsewhere. The mode of action is receptor-mediated, and estrogen receptors exist in mammals and other vertebrates. A large number of studies on the effects of EE2 on aquatic organisms exist. One hundred English language studies published between 1994 and 2007, one as yet unpublished study, and findings published in conference proceedings (in German) were compared to published data quality criteria to identify the most relevant studies for deriving a predicted no-effect concentration (PNEC). Reproduction in fish was identified as the most sensitive end point in aquatic species. A species sensitivity distribution was constructed using no observed effect concentrations (NOECs) for reproductive effects from 39 papers in 26 species, resulting in a median hazardous concentration at which 5% of the species tested are affected (HC5,50) of 0.35 ng/L. After comparing this HC5,50 to all of the laboratory and field-derived toxicity information available for EE2, we recommend using 0.35 ng/L as the PNEC for EE2 in surface water. This PNEC is below 95% of the existing NOECs for effects on reproduction and is also below virtually all of the NOECs for vitellogenin induction in the key fish reproduction studies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nash, J. P., Kime, D. E., Van der Ven, L. T. M., Wester, P. W., Brion, F., Maack, G., Stahlschmidt-Allner, P., & Tyler, C. R. (2004) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.7209 · Cited by 664
Cited by
Ankley, G. T., Bennett, R. S., Erickson, R. J., Hoff, D. J., Hornung, M. W., Johnson, R. D., Mount, D. R., Nichols, J. W., Russom, C. L., Schmieder, P. K., et al. (2009) · Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry · doi:10.1002/etc.34 · Cited by 2,734
Caldwell, D. J., Mastrocco, F., Anderson, P. D., Länge, R., & Sumpter, J. P. (2012) · Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry · doi:10.1002/etc.1825 · Cited by 373
Self-citationPharmaceutical metabolites in the environment: Analytical challenges and ecological risks
Celiz, M. D., Tso, J., & Aga, D. S. (2010) · Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry · doi:10.1897/09-173.1 · Cited by 339
Huysman, S., Van Meulebroek, L., Vanryckeghem, F., Van Langenhove, H., Demeestere, K., & Vanhaecke, L. (2017) · Analytica Chimica Acta · doi:10.1016/j.aca.2017.07.001 · Cited by 56
Viega, B. L., Rocha, A. M., & Düsman, E. (2020) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-019-07392-0 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Caldwell, D. J., Mastrocco, F., Hutchinson, T. H., Länge, R., Heijerick, D., Janssen, C., Anderson, P. D., & Sumpter, J. P.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2008-08-21
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 7046-7054
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W1965388927
- Cited by
- 265
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Derivation of an Aquatic Predicted No-Effect Concentration for the Synthetic Hormone, 17α-Ethinyl Estradiol. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/es800633q
- The paper
- Caldwell, D. J., Mastrocco, F., Hutchinson, T. H., Länge, R., Heijerick, D., Janssen, C., Anderson, P. D., & Sumpter, J. P. (2008). Derivation of an Aquatic Predicted No-Effect Concentration for the Synthetic Hormone, 17α-Ethinyl Estradiol. Environmental Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1021/es800633q
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.